User talk:Woohookitty: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
SomeStranger (talk | contribs)
1,489 edits
Protection of Kosovo (A minor template change)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Dear asshat, quit using socks and abusive bans to push POV on NLP
'''Archives:''' [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive|1]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive2|2]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive3|3]],
[[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive4|4]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive5|5]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive6|6]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive7|7]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive8|8]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive9|9]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive10|10]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive11|11]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive12|12]], [[User_talk:Woohookitty/Archivevfd|vfd comments]]




==Katefan0==
It looks like [[User talk:Katefan0|Katefan0]] has left wikipedia, because of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKatefan0&diff=55285578&oldid=55239921 this] It's a sad day for wikipedia. I went to [[User talk:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] talk page and stated my thoughts there, but I just previewed it, I didn't save it. I don't know if there's anything he could or would do about it. We've lost a dedicated admin. I hope she comes back, despite this attack from an outside source. [[User:Mytwocents|Mytwocents]] 18:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

==Points-paying==
Care to elaborate on why you don't think it should be merged? "I don't think it should be" generally doesn't cut it. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 01:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
:No, but they're given points per race and then at the end of a season the points are totalled up and whoever has the most wins. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 03:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
::It is certainly a different concept than what is discussed in the current [[Score (gaming)]] article, but I think it would make sense include a section there that discusses standings, etc. as those are ways of keeping score as well, just over a longer period of time. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 04:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
:::If you don't mind I'm going to put the merge tag back on the article to see if we can get anyone elses opinion. I don't feel real comfortable using the whole "argue with people until they get bored and give up" technique that Wikipedia sort of requires at times. [[User:Recury|Recury]] 16:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

==NLP==
Hi, I noticed an ingoing dispute over the validity of NLP. I have personally been witness to individuals applying NLP with increased sex in interpersonal attraction of the opposite sex. I used qualatitive research and group interviewed four individuals who explained to me the processes of 'negging' and 'anchoring' and 'indicators of interest'. I may be a casual Wikipedian reader but If pushed I want to assert the validity of NLP as I know it works. Of course, as my interviews were unstructured and I haven't yet completed my Psychology course and still ongoing there is considerable delay before I take this further. Instead, I offer the advice that any strong member on the NLP page to review the claims Ross Jeffries has made. [www.seduction.gr] has video torrents outlining his seduction technique in full detail, and also videos where the techniques have been used publicly with success. Thanks for hearing me out --[[User:213.106.102.178|213.106.102.178]] 10:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

== Gibraltarian now targeting Falkland Islands ==

It seems nowadays Gibraltarian is targeting the article [[Falkland Islands]]. The article was protected by {{admin|Katefan0}} twice, the most recent time with an instruction "please contact me before unprotecting...", but both times, {{admin|Voice_of_All}} later unprotected the article unilaterally, saying "been long enough...", but that's not true - unprotection caused G to reactivate both times, and now that Katefan0 has announced her departure, I'd like you to monitor this page and if necessary, protect the page and tell VoA to contact you before unprotecting. 00:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

:He is targeting [[San Roque, Cádiz]] too. Please help if you can. Thanks, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 23:59, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

::And [[Algeciras]] too. This guy is a neverending nightmare! [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 20:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

== request ==
:Wow, they got kate too? She was the best. I can't imagine why anyone would be angry with her. With my paranoia meter at full now, would you zap [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Derex/Archive_1&redirect=no this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Derex this]? Lord knows there are enough nuts out there whom I've crossed. I'm a nobody, but who needs a stalker? Thanks much for all. [[User_talk:Derex|Derex]] 17:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

:I'll just re-create it. It has a unique fingerprint in the history. Such that a BD, or possibly a Rex (though I think he's probably harmless), could track me down with a little effort. Thanks again, and sorry about Kate. Brandt is crowing about it over on Wikipedia Review. Sick bastard. [[User_talk:Derex|Derex]] 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

== User SuperDeng ==

I request that you do something again'st him. He doesn't stop stalking me. He reverts practically EVERYTHING I do as vandalism and does not provide a reason for doing so. He just says things like "sneaky vandalism, spreading of misinformation".

See history of the Second Battle of the Atlantic. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Battle_of_the_Atlantic&action=history I had requested the editors to talk about the term "Decisive Allied Victory" at the talk page. Everything was going OK until Deng came and started editing while the debate was still going on.

Similiar thing happened at the Polish September Campaing article e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polish_September_Campaign&action=history

You are free to look at my contributions.

Kurt.

== VoABot2 ==

I am about to make VoABot2, which will watch pages where arbcom or several admins block reccuring banned users. I'll just enter the IP range data, and it will watch the history and autorevert anyone from that range. It is kind of like protection against specific IPs for a specific article. What do you think of this idea? If it makes you uneasy, then I'll just do it for arbcomed users.'''[[User:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]'''<sup>[[user_talk:Voice_of_All|<font color="blue">Talk</font>]]</sup> 21:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
:Actually, it may be easier to just have VoABot do those.'''[[User:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]'''<sup>[[user_talk:Voice_of_All|<font color="blue">Talk</font>]]</sup> 21:12, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
==Behave myself?==
If the merits of your arguments against me are so powerful, why don't you get me unblocked, so I can discuss them with ArbComm? [[User:216.239.38.136|216.239.38.136]] 04:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

::Could you remove 216.239.38.136's comments from Merecat's userpage? I believe it doesn't belong there. [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 05:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

:::Ok, fair enough. I guess if he wants to get them unblocked hard enough, I guess he'll attract an admins attention and eventually wear himself out from failing so often. ;-) But seriously, I don't think he should be unblocked. [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 05:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

::::That must have been a hellish night, eh? Yeah, I would agree with that block, he hasn't been doing us any favors tonight. Cheers! [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 05:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

:::::Wish I had IRC working on my computer, it sounds interesting. And oh, I do know. ;-) I used to have an account on Wikipedia before. I ended up in a conflict with a user that lasted over 6 months. It would still be ongoing if I hadn't abandoned the account. Don't worry, I wasn't one of the bad ones ;-) Darn shame I left my old account though, never had a single block to my name. Oh well.. [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 05:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

<small>PS. sorry if the above comment freaked you out any. [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 05:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)</small>

:::Know what you mean about the past chances. I tried to give my personal vandal the benefit of the doubt and actually agreed to allow him to stay on Wikipedia but then he turned around and vandalized my userpage for no reason whatsoever. Needless to say, I don't have to worry about him anymore. ;-) Nope, not a bad guy, actually I think I racked up somewhere around your total number of edits before I left. [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 06:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

::::Actually, I think I was somewhere around 21,000 when I left. :s Thats why it so hard to leave my past account. I was so well known as my past name and all my hard work went down the gutter. Oh well, it was worth it to leave my vandal behind. [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 06:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

:::::Well, it's going on 3:00 a.m. where I am, so I' going off now. Good chatting with you! Cheers! [[User:DGX|<font color="00FF00">D</font><font color="000000" >G</font>]][[User talk:DGX|<font color="00FF00">X</font>]] 06:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

==Privacy Protection==
Hi Woohookitty. I heard about Kate. Well, at the very least for selfish reasons, I just hope we get someone as helpful as her for the NLP and related articles. Certainly from the responses I see, she's contributed a great deal to Wikipedia. I understand her leaving though. In fact I reckon there should be very clear cautionary statements for anyone wishing to administer or edit. Threats of legal action, violence, abuse or even simple verbal threats both explicit an implied are hard to cope with. Anonymity is always quite transparent when networks are concerned. Anyway, do you know of anything being done about this kind of issue within Wikipedia? My wife is a legal expert and a barrister, and I have some legal knowledge also concerning privacy laws and regs. I'd like to see if I can contribute something. [[User:Bookmain|Bookmain]] 09:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

== page protection ==
Thanks Woohookitty, for protecting [[Kosovo]] page. It's been a center of attacks by several sockpuppets, meatpuppets, anonymous IP's changing all the time, NPOV pushers, etc. It would be maybe nice to keep it so for some time. 13:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks Woohookitty. I bet we are all missing Katefan now... I feel really bad as I was about to give her a barnstar for her superb job in the page protection noticeboard. Nonetheless, I emailed her with my support, the sad thing is that she has done no wrong and that guy who is stalking her can't even understand wikipedia rules: he seems to think she was endorsing some sort of whitewashing, when the only thing she was doing was protecting an article. On a different matter, to the user who left the comment above, it was me who requested the protection. I have been keeping a close eye on the article for a while. I would like to remind you that the finality of the Protection Status is to stop edit wars and reach consensus, not to endorse any given version. It would make me very glad to see some constructive efforts by all parties involved in that sense. Regards, [[User:Asterion/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''''E '''''</font>]][[User:Asterion|<font color="Blue">'''Asterion'''</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Asterion|<font color="Green">'''u talking to me?'''</font>]]</small></sup> 20:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

::Yo, Asterion, I just thanked the guy. "The user who left the comment above", is that how you address me from now on? Since you did request this protection, then thank you, too. Gosh..[[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 00:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


Woohookitty, I'm a Swedish user with keen interest in European issues (and a MSc in European Studies). My aim is for Wikipedia articles to be well written, concise and NPOV (including free of selective 'evidence', emotional language, etc). Sadly, a lot of the articles on topics related to ex Yugoslavia don't fill these criteria but rather tend to serve as arenas for pushing various political agendas and victimization.

A recent example of this is the Kosovo article where a number of Kosovar Albanians don't like to hear that Kosovo is still formally considered a province of Serbia, although administered by the UN.

In order to break the deadlock I have suggested the wording used by the US Council on Foreign Relations on Kosovo [http://www.cfr.org/publication/9936/] (the website is quite good overall). It says, under the heading "What is Kosovo's political status?":

"Since NATO forces occupied Kosovo in 1999, the province has been a protectorate of the United Nations, with broad administrative responsibility under a mission called UNMIK. Technically, Kosovo remains a province of Serbia."

A January 2006 US Congressional Research Service special report [http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Kosovo_%20Future_Status.pdf] also states this saying (page 2):

"UNSC Resolution 1244 provides little insight into how the status issue should be resolved, saying only that it should be determined by an unspecified “political process.” However, the resolution explicitly confirms the territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (consisting of Serbia and neighboring Montenegro) and calls for “substantial autonomy” for Kosovo “within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.” The FRY was dissolved in February 2003, replaced with a looser “state union” entitled “Serbia and Montenegro.” Kosovars believe that the dissolution of the FRY invalidates this portion of UNSC Resolution 1244, while the international community views Kosovo as part of Serbia." (my emphasis added).

Now, since UNSCR 1244 confirmed the territorial integrity of what was then Yugoslavia and the UN, EU Commission, UNMIK, US government and all other describe Kosovo as a province of Serbia shouldn't also Wikipedia do this regardless of the political ambitions of various Kosovar Albanian users?

I don't see how you can compromise on the facts.
[[User:Osli73|Osli73]] 13:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

::The compromise can be found in the resolution 1244, where it is clearly stated that Kosovo will be formally considered as a part of FRY, and the UN interim admin there will lead the process to define its status (hint: there is no status until then). Osli73, referring to non-partisan organisations resarch groups and several old maps is trying to impose his NPOV on an article, and at the same time refusing to quote the documents with the highest importance in Kosovo, 1244 [http://www.nato.int/kosovo/docu/u990610a.htm Resolution] and Kosovo's [www.unmikonline.org/constframework.htm Constitutional Framework]. Ignoring these two important documents, and instead referring to sites of convenience to NPOV push is not appreciated in Wikipedia. Furthermore, no need to accuse Kosovar Albanian wikipedians, for inisting in these internationally recognized, and most important documents valid in Kosovo as of now. Regards, [[User:Ilir pz|ilir_pz]] 13:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

:::Please don't do this on my talk page. Thanks. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|(meow)]]</sup> 13:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Ilir,

1. Yes, UNSCR 1244 confirms the territorial integrity of FRY (now SCG, soon only Serbia).

2. According to the Constitution of SCG Kosovo is a province of Serbia. Ergo, Kosovo '''is''' a province of Serbia.

3. The EU, UN, the US and all countries in Europe (except maybe Albania) obviously se Kosovo as province of Serbia, as shown by my references.

4. When respected media organizations like the BBC present Kosovo to its readers (see my previous link) it defines Kosovo as a province of Serbia.

5. Albanian nationalists (and you do define yourself as one on your user page) prefer to see Kosovo as a province of FRY with unclear legal status since it would imply that Serbia has no legal claim on Kosovo.
[[User:Osli73|Osli73]] 14:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

== Bravo ==
You did the right thing [[User:DMorpheus|DMorpheus]] 15:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

And again. [[User:DMorpheus|DMorpheus]] 14:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

::: I agree wholeheartedly. I admire your willingness to take this on since I know there was a lot of disagreement last time you tried to manage this. I don't know why he is allowed to edit at all; IMHO he should be banned. He contributes very little value, and disrupts constantly. [[User:DMorpheus|DMorpheus]] 14:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

== My speedies ==

Thanks :) [[User:Betacommand|Betacommand]] 07:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

== [[User:Randy121]] ==

Sorry I should've made it more clear, he was blocked before for three hours then returned and proceeded to do the same thing. I didn't warn him again because I thought the previous blocking would've been sufficent. This was asking to block the user for the new nonsense that happened since the last block. --- [[User:Lid|Lid]] 09:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

== Gibraltarian and semi-protection ==

Hi, saw you semi-protected [[Falkland Islands]] and was wondering if you'd mind doing the same to [[Algeciras]] and [[San Roque, Cádiz]]. The recent edit histories are almost entirely reverts of [[User:Gibraltarian]]'s edits. Cheers, — [[User:Ceejayoz|ceejayoz]] <sup><font color="darkred">[[User_talk:Ceejayoz|talk]]</font></sup> 16:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

== SuperDeng again. ==

This isn't going anywhere. You can ban me and him again if you wish, but that doesn't solve the problem. He says that practically everything I do is vandalism. It seems that he is too lazy to do research. E.g.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_the_Atlantic

SuperDeng: "rv, the removeing of vital information"

What I altered was this.

"Vice Admiral Karl Dönitz, commander of German U-boats (BdU, 1935-1943), Commander-in-Chief of the German Navy, 1943-1945; at war's end, Hitler's successor as Führer."

Dönitz was only Reichspräsident, his title was not Führer (but it seems that Deng doesn't realise even this. I have said this many times and he could find it out by simply looking at Karl Dönitz article), and I truly don't think that information regarding his presidency is relevant in the article.

My form.

"Karl Dönitz, commander of the German U-boat fleet between 1935 and 1943, and Commander-in-Chief of the German Navy from January 1943 to May 1945."

Another good example is the Winter War article (see it yourself). I suggested that people would discus about the change I did in the battle box at the talk page, but he rejected this offer and reverted, his only justification apparently being the RFC. That is no justification, you have said this yourself.

I would like to solve this "peacefully", I truly would.

Kurt.


:::Others revert you on many articles for example the battle of the netherlands and winter war which proves that you are a vandal. You remove sourced numbers and alter real facts. And you insert only vandalism into articles for example finland is not part of scandinavia therefore it can not have a scandinavian winter, but it is part of the north and can have a nordic winter. Respond to your rfc and explain your acts of mass vandalism instead of vandalizing even more pages. And respond in the proper field and in a coherent fashion ([[User:SuperDeng|Deng]] 09:50, 2 June 2006 (UTC))

:If you wanna solve this peacefully, stop making edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Winter_War&diff=18008087&oldid=18004549 this]. -- [[User:Grafikm_fr|<font color="Blue">'''Grafikm'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Grafikm_fr|'''<font color="red">(AutoGRAF)</font>''']]</sup> 10:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

==Hello==

{{tfd|Smile}}
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Face-smile-big.svg|left|60px| ]]

{{{1|[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing! {{{2|}}}
</div><!-- Template:smile2 --> --[[User:Bhadani|Bhadani]] 14:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

==Gibraltar==
Hello Woohookitty,

User Ecemaml has told us to ask you for help with a problem me and a number of users, including Ecemaml, have had with the article on Gibraltar. Perhaps you could provide some form of arbitration. Over the past few months, user Gibnews has imposed his POV version of the article on the vast majority of users. Other opinions backed with acceptable sources are dismissed by him as pro-Spanish. He also seems to convey a sense of irrational hostility towards Spain and Spaniards which are reflected in his edits. If you check the history of the talk page, he has driven away a number of users over the past few months. He is now engaged in disputes regarding articles on "San Roque" and "Algeciras" (cities close to the British territory of Gibraltar.) Permanently banned user "Gibraltarian" has recently returned to support him as an unregistered user signing as "yanito". On the other side of the debate, the only user showing a (Pro Spanish POV) tendentious and aggressive behaviour is User Ismael76, although he seems to have got bored of the issue and left the debate.

I was wondering if you could give us some advice on what we should do with Gibnews and the article in general. It is sad when users appropriate articles as their own to express their POVs.

Please have a look at the following:

[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gibraltar/1 Talk page 1]]
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gibraltar Talk page 2]]
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gibraltar&action=history Edits to Gibraltar Article]]
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gibnews User contributions by Gibnews]]


Thanks alot

Ok but can u at leas block User: Gibraltarian who is permanently banned and is now continuing to vandalise a number of pages with IP address 195.244.194.29 . I think even User: Gibnews (whith whom I often argue) will agree to this.

Cheers!--[[User:Burgas00|Burgas00]] 23:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Burgas00.

==RFCU Abuse==
When you get a chance I would appreciate it if you can see [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser#User:Rex071404.2FUser:Merecat]] The user [[User:RyanFreisling]] has added my name to the RFCU without citing any evidence other then my support for user Merecat, same for 2 other IP's added by [[User:Nescio]] which is in violation of RFCU policy. [[User:RyanFreisling]] is using it as an intimidation tactic to get me to drop support for a look into merecat/rex's case. Using RFCU for this purpose is obviously a punishable offense. --[[User:Zer0faults|<font color="Red">'''zero faults'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Zer0faults#Signature|''<font color="Blue"><sup>|sockpuppets|</sup></font>'']] 15:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The above user has now resorted to personal attacks in violation of WP:PA [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser&diff=56837480&oldid=prev] --[[User:Zer0faults|<font color="Red">'''zero faults'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Zer0faults#Signature|''<font color="Blue"><sup>|sockpuppets|</sup></font>'']] 15:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

:I have added his name because of his 1) absolute refusal to answer the question 'Are you Rex' and 2) because his behavior consists almost entirely of Merecat-related disputes, in which he carries on the lies of his prior self. This is a valid CU, and this user needs to cease his disruptive and evasive behavior. -- [[User:RyanFreisling]] [[User_talk:RyanFreisling|@]] 16:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

== Cleanup Taskforce: Bill James ==

I have added the entry for [[Bill James]] to [[User:Woohookitty/desk|your desk]] because you have listed an interest in baseball. Please check your desk and either accept or pass (let me know if you'd like me to reassigned it). Thank you. [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] 19:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

==Checkuser complete==
You made a request for a Checkuser to be run, which has now been completed. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser#Completed_requests]] for the results. [[User:the wub|the wub]] [[User_talk:The wub|<font color="green">"?!"</font>]] 22:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

==Way to be strong==

<s> in the face of this. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKizzle&diff=57125572&oldid=57116206].</s> Apparently it was a bad joke. Very bad. Take care. -- [[User:RyanFreisling]] [[User_talk:RyanFreisling|@]] 05:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
:Probably more of an in joke. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|(meow)]]</sup> 05:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

==Deng==
I am happy, you have reconsidered. OK, I will try to control Deng, hope Irpen and Tyres will help us too. Maybe we can swap, you try to mentor [[User:AlexPU]] and I will try my chances with Deng. Both will return in a month. [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 05:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

== VoABot ==

I think I finally fixed the 2nd heading bug that caused the "unprotection" requests section to not show correctly for some reason (due to a single extra character). It can be fixed with null edits, and the bot is programmed to make them (if nothing changes then there will be no edit) just in case. Keep an eye out though would you? I watch it while I can, though I am tired now.

Also, do you have any suggestions for it? Thanks.'''[[User:Voice of All|<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue">-of-</font><font color="black">All</font>]]'''<sup>[[user_talk:Voice_of_All|<font color="blue">Talk</font>]]</sup> 06:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

== 711 hours, lol ==

In case you weren't aware, you can also specify an exact expiration time, such as "23:59 August 19, 2009" or "next Wednesday", etc., which would most likely be easier than breaking out the calculator, it's pretty user-friendly in that respect. — <small>Jun. 6, '06</small><tt> '''[10:22] <<u class=plainlinks>[{{fullurl:user:freakofnurture}} freak]|[{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit&section=new}} talk]</u>>'''</tt>
:As for block conflicts, the system should, at a minimum, warn you like it does for an edit conflict, or when you attempt to move one page on top of another. Something like, "User:$1 is already blocked by User:$2, with an expiry time of $3 (reason: $4)" with choices: "change block duration to [whatever you had in mind]" and "cancel", or something... — <small>Jun. 6, '06</small><tt> '''[10:33] <<u class=plainlinks>[{{fullurl:user:freakofnurture}} freak]|[{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit&section=new}} talk]</u>>'''</tt>

==Helen Wu==
I feel awful being "worse than Woohookitty". Isn't it interesting how many cynics there are just in one block. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]]) 15:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

==[[User:Añoranza]]==
I think this user might have been unfairly blocked. Zerofault's made an incident report since he didn't like Anoranza's edits.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:A.C3.B1oranza] Then Zerofault's makes another incident report and then an admin blocks Anoranza for a week apparently because he questioned the motives of an admin by saying: ''"You block me because you cannot count up to three, in spite of being involved in the conflict yourself, then your threaten me instead of apologizing, and now you complain about incivility? I'd call that barefaced."''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:A.C3.B1oranza_again] The drastic action taken against Anoranza strikes me as particularly odd given that not long ago Nomen Nescio made an incident report about Zerofault's altering his comments and it was ignored.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive106#Zer0faults_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29] I could be wrong though. -- [[User:Mr. Tibbs|Mr. Tibbs]] 04:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
:Read the incident report, Nescio is stating I would not let him edit his own comments, not that I edited them. He was attempting to edit comments on the talk page that I already replied to. Even he admits that much, I dont understand why you are carrying this on. --[[User:Zer0faults|<font color="Red">'''zero faults'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Zer0faults#Signature|''<font color="Blue"><sup>|sockpuppets|</sup></font>'']] 10:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
::Me either since I'm not going to get involved. So take it somewhere else please. --[[User:Woohookitty|''Woohookitty'']]<sup>[[User talk:Woohookitty|(meow)]]</sup> 10:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

== [[User:UNFORGIVEN]] ==

There's one on his account here. In wikimedia he's uploaded two [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?&wiki=commons.wikimedia.org&img_user_text=UNFORGIVEN] - and both of those are definately fake copyright to me. - [[User:Lid|Lid]] 05:27, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

== RFCU ==
Your checkuser on Hylas Chung is complete. [[User:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 16:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

== Protection of Kosovo (A minor template change) ==

I noticed that you protected the article, [[Kosovo]] so I figured I would ask you this request. I was hoping that you could remove the template "more" from the article, and replace it with template "morepolitics" as the previous template has been moved to the latter as the new name better describes the actual function of the template. Thanks for the help.--<b>[[User:SomeStranger|<font color="orange">SomeStrang</font>]]<i>[[User:SomeStranger/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]]</i>[[User:SomeStranger|<font color="orange">r</font>]]</b><sup><small>([[User talk:SomeStranger|<font color="green">t</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/SomeStranger|<font color="green">c</font>]])</small></sup> 11:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:26, 12 June 2006

Dear asshat, quit using socks and abusive bans to push POV on NLP

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Woohookitty&oldid=58136906"