User talk:Yanksox: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Doc glasgow (talk | contribs)
→‎[[Daniel Brandt]]: ::He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--~~~~
Freakofnurture (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
:Umm... WTF is going on? I can understand the desire to get rid of that cesspool, but unilaterally deleting the article ''and'' the talk is not the way. Can you provide any reason why I shouldn't undelete? [[User talk:Zocky|Zocky]] | [[User:Zocky/Picture Popups|picture popups]] 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
:Umm... WTF is going on? I can understand the desire to get rid of that cesspool, but unilaterally deleting the article ''and'' the talk is not the way. Can you provide any reason why I shouldn't undelete? [[User talk:Zocky|Zocky]] | [[User:Zocky/Picture Popups|picture popups]] 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
::He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--[[User talk:Doc glasgow|Doc]]<sup>g</sup> 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
::He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--[[User talk:Doc glasgow|Doc]]<sup>g</sup> 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

If there is any sentence, any word in that entire article that violates BLP, please point it out. The article itself is not libellous, but the personal attacks you made in deleting it are quite offensive. —<tt class="plainlinks">'''[[Special:Contributions/Freakofnurture|freak]]([{{fullurl:user talk:freakofnurture|action=edit&section=new}} talk])'''</tt> 16:32, Feb. 23, 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:32, 23 February 2007

.....And I just came here to give you a barnstar for your boldness and humanity--Docg 13:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]



About bloody time too. And, when it stays dead, I'll know Wikipedia has matured!--Docg 13:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Daniel Brandt. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Cat out 14:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm... WTF is going on? I can understand the desire to get rid of that cesspool, but unilaterally deleting the article and the talk is not the way. Can you provide any reason why I shouldn't undelete? Zocky | picture popups 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He seems to have gone for now - we are currently discussing this on DRV, perhaps you'd like to contribute to that.--Docg 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there is any sentence, any word in that entire article that violates BLP, please point it out. The article itself is not libellous, but the personal attacks you made in deleting it are quite offensive. —freak(talk) 16:32, Feb. 23, 2007 (UTC)