User talk:Youngamerican: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:24, 17 July 2009

Please click here to leave me a new message and I will respond on your talk page. If I have left you a message on your talk page, please respond here. I have better things to do than to stalk your talk page, just as you have more important priorities that to keep watching and/or checking back with mine (unless you don't, in which case I suggest joining your local YMCA or perhaps adopting a puppy) and, frankly, the idea of someone watching my talk page sorta creeps me out. But then again, if you were not inclined to respond here and instead replied on your own talk page, you probably aren't reading this, so the point is moot. If that is the case, hopefully I will get around to checking my past posts to other users' talk pages sooner than later, but most likely I won't for a while. Either way, I'm sure that you are a valued editor and keep up the good work (unless you aren't, then should instead start, um, creating good work or something).

Pwned? On a spaghetti-sauce-masquerading-as-chili-argument?

No not really. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 02:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oops, my bad Don't know why I thought that, sorry!! You from Kentucky then? You're interested in Southern Ohio, so my assessment of your location belief stems from that. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Adminship is something I would aspire to. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 18:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helpful guidelines and suggestions! JWithing (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jerem43

I noticed that you nominated Jerem43 for administration. While I cannot know what qualifies an individual for Wikipedia administration, I would hope individuals that have recently violated Wikipedia's own policies and guidelines on cavility and courtesy. Please refer to this discussion to inform your opinions. If such behavior and attitude is condoned, I have no issue.

152.16.10.191 (talk) 18:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm WP:AGF on his attempt to remove a spam link, but I've removed them for the time being to let Jerem43 decide how to proceed. Cheers. youngamerican (wtf?) 19:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I have established a check user on this guy, made three days ago when this issue arose. He keeps re-adding a spam link to a company that specializes in franchise management to this article that was originally made by a SPA called User:Franchiseguru. He has been violating rules regarding legal threats while evading the point, his personal attack comments refer to a simple L1 warning I gave him when he started restoring the links I was deleting. I have been trying to keep out of an edit war, and have removed all of the stuff he is claiming as plagiarism.--Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there is something to discuss about the article, I welcome further discussion on that article's discussion page. I'm simply here trying to inform User:Youngamerican that he or she may wish to observe current behavior and attitude in dealing with a conflict opinion. When nominating someone to be an administrator, one hopes that they would uphold each and every policy of the site, especially the ones that deal with communication. I believe that the rude and course manner in which you address my concerns is not very becoming. It brings doubts to any ability to an effective administrator. I bring up concerns here, as I don't really care if you continue the nomination or not, I just enjoy all facts being known.

The concerned is doubled when I see that Jarem43 has felt the need to delete my questions and comments from his own talk page, without addressing them. It suggests that he is attempting to hide certain behaviors that he is aware are inappropriate. One then questions what other comments in the past have been removed that might also have reflected poorly.152.16.10.191 (talk) 16:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 :Just to let you know I have established a check user on this guy, made three days ago when this issue arose. He keeps re-adding a spam link to a company that specializes in franchise management to this article that was originally made by a SPA called [[User:Franchiseguru]]. He has been violating rules regarding legal threats while evading the point, his personal attack comments refer to a simple L1 warning I gave him when he started restoring the links I was deleting. I have been trying to keep out of an edit war, and have removed all of the stuff he is claiming as plagiarism.--[[User:Jerem43|Jeremy]] <small>([[User talk:Jerem43|blah blah]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jerem43|I did it!]])</small> 20:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
-::If there is something to discuss about the article, I welcome further discussion on that article's discussion page.  I'm simply here trying to inform [[[User:Youngamerican]] that he or she may wish to observe current behavior and attitude in dealing with a conflict opinion.  When nominating someone to be an administrator, one hopes that they would uphold each and every policy of the site, especially the ones that deal with communication.  I believe that the rude and course manner in which you address my concerns is not very becoming.  It brings doubts to any ability to an effective administrator.  I bring up concerns here, as I don't really care if you continue the nomination or not, I just enjoy all facts being known.
+::If there is something to discuss about the article, I welcome further discussion on that article's discussion page.  I'm simply here trying to inform [[User:Youngamerican]] that he or she may wish to observe current behavior and attitude in dealing with a conflict opinion.  When nominating someone to be an administrator, one hopes that they would uphold each and every policy of the site, especially the ones that deal with communication.  I believe that the rude and course manner in which you address my concerns is not very becoming.  It brings doubts to any ability to an effective administrator.  I bring up concerns here, as I don't really care if you continue the nomination or not, I just enjoy all facts being known.
 ::The concerned is doubled when I see that Jarem43 has felt the need to delete my questions and comments from his own talk page, without addressing them.  It suggests that he is attempting to hide certain behaviors that he is aware are inappropriate.  One then questions what other comments in the past have been removed that might also have reflected poorly.[[Special:Contributions/152.16.10.191|152.16.10.191]] ([[User talk:152.16.10.191|talk]]) 16:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)