Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inaccurate claims or bias of Sean Hannity: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:12, 7 September 2007

Inaccurate claims or bias of Sean Hannity

This article is a clear POV fork of Sean Hannity Burzmali 00:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure any appropriate, sourced content is reflected in the Hannity article and then delete as a clear POV fork. Erechtheus 00:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no citations on this page, little if any encyclopedic information, and it is a clear POV fork. While this is not in itself a criteria for deletion, the user who created it has made no edits except for this article and is the only editor of the article (with the exception of the person who nominated it for deletion. I definitely am no fan of Hannity, but it is clearly a POV fork and a POV-pushing article, which both violate the most important policy of Wikipedia. Life, Liberty, Property 01:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My real reason is that there is no way this article could be written in NPOV because the title itself is a POV. My not-so-serious / kind of true reason is that this article would be unmaintainable because of sheer abundance of information to include. --דניאל - Dantheman531 01:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all verifiable info into Sean Hannity, then delete. --Evb-wiki 02:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (steal anythings alvagable to Sean Hannity. Obvious POVFORK and unverified.--ZayZayEM 03:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Content fork. Topic should be covered, and is already covered in the main Hannity article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - For starters, the title itself is POV because it says that the opinions given are automatically wrong. Rest of article is OR and any (I highlight the any) text which can be proven can be merged into Hannity's main article. Spawn Man 06:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - OR essay. Gatoclass 07:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - By definition the article can't adhere WP:NPOV with this title. 1redrun ^Talk 07:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure POV fork Lurker (said · done) 11:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per everyone. Wikipedia cannot afford articles like this.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even the title may constitute an NPoV violation, as well as a POV fork. If it cannot be included in the Sean Hannity article in a neutral and concise manner without violating WP:BLP, then it cannot stand alone as a fork or split-off either. Is this turning into a snowball yet? --T-dot ( ^Talk/contribs ) 18:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and kill it with a stick. Clearly POV. Corvus cornix 18:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bitter, much? --Deusnoctum 21:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You guys are acting as censors eager to kill my work without giving me opportunity to make specific changes. I will post it verbatim later when I get back, but you are supposed to according to Wiki policy jelp me bring my article inot compliance. Instead, the Burzmali who tagged me for deletion IMMEDIATELY seeks only to remove my work as expeditiously as possible, without help me improve it. This is not the soviet union, and censorship is not the right of faceless would-be Nero`s who turn thumbs down with snide comments. Abide by Wiki policy now or late it your choice,and the reccomendations to help me into compliance or give up your eiditorial rights.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *'''Delete and kill it with a stick'''.  Clearly POV.  [[User:Corvus cornix|Corvus cornix]] 18:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Bitter, much? --[[User:Deusnoctum|Deusnoctum]] 21:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
+You guys are acting as censors eager to kill my work without giving me opportunity to make specific changes.  I will post it verbatim later when I get back, but you are supposed to according to Wiki policy jelp me bring my article inot compliance.  Instead, the Burzmali who tagged me for deletion IMMEDIATELY seeks only to remove my work as expeditiously as possible, without help me improve it.  This is not the soviet union, and censorship is not the right of faceless would-be Nero`s who turn thumbs down with snide comments.  Abide by Wiki policy now or late it your choice,and the reccomendations to help me into compliance or give up your eiditorial rights.