Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 June 23: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Cultural references in Pokémon]]: close: endorse deletion |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===June 23 2006=== |
===June 23 2006=== |
||
====[[Cultural references in Pokémon]]==== |
|||
:(currently a redirect to [[Pokémon (anime)]]) |
|||
I request the article be restored to before the last AfD. There are lots of similar articles, that are good enough to be kept. I will find people who are willing to improve the page vastly, so that it could be more notable in the eyes of many users. [[User:CoolKatt number 99999|CoolKatt number 99999]] 02:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural references in Pokémon 4|The AFD in question]]. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 03:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Endorse deletion''' Very strong consensus in AFD for deletion. Nomination above was raised in the AFD and responded to (negatively) by multiple other participants. Prior AFDs were properly mentioned and linked in at the top. [[User:GRBerry|GRBerry]] 04:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''' I voted keep on the AfD, but it was deleted by policy, and I don't see any reason to overturn it. -[[User:Goldom|Goldom]] [[User_talk:Goldom|‽‽‽]] [[Special:Contributions/Goldom|⁂]] 04:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse''', very strong deletion. '''[[User:Sceptre|Will]]''' ([[User_talk:Sceptre|message me!]]) 10:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse''', the correct procedure was followed and no new information has come to light. - [[User:Motor|Motor]] ([[User talk:Motor|talk)]] 13:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse''' - This should be, at most, a footnote in the main Pokémon article. --[[User:Improv|Improv]] 13:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''', valid per process and absolutely the correct decision per policy. [[User Talk:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid; padding:0px 2px 2px 2px; color:white; background-color:darkblue; font-weight:bold">Guy</span> you know?]] 21:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse'''. "There are lots of similar articles" is ''never'' a valid argument. [[User:Zoe]]|[[User talk:Zoe|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 22:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''' per original consensus. Valid deletion per process. --[[User:Coredesat|Coredesat]] 00:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*I am starting to suspect that Sockpuppets were involved. [[User:CoolKatt number 99999|CoolKatt number 99999]] 01:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
**Sock puppets used solely for the AfD of course, no other articles. [[User:CoolKatt number 99999|CoolKatt number 99999]] 01:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
***Don't even start. You [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural references in Pokémon|made]] [[Talk:Pokémon (anime)#In Response...|yourself]] look absurd last time with your paranoia. With your other conflicts, do you really want to further demolish any positive opinion other users have of you? [[User:Apostrophe|<small><b>'</b></small>]] <sup>([[User talk:Apostrophe|Feeling chatty?]] ) ([[Special:Contributions/Apostrophe|Edits!]])</sup> 05:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
****Don't deny it, either. You could have also forced these people to vote "delete" so that you could win. It is either that, or sockpuppets. [[User:CoolKatt number 99999|CoolKatt number 99999]] 19:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*****There's also the much-more-likely possibility that people disagree with you. It does happen. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 05:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
******Ah, yes, with my psychic powers, I was able to force indivduals to vote to delete a Wikipedia article. [[User:Apostrophe|<small><b>'</b></small>]] <sup>([[User talk:Apostrophe|Feeling chatty?]] ) ([[Special:Contributions/Apostrophe|Edits!]])</sup> 03:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse Deletion''' And any further claims of sock puppetry against me without any evidence other than agreeing with someone on an AFD will be considered a personal attack. --[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] 01:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
**Speaking of personal attacks, I think this AfD was a whole personal attack on me. [[User:CoolKatt number 99999|CoolKatt number 99999]] 22:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment:''' I've notified [[User:Johntex|Johntex]] of this DRV. --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 02:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''', valid AfD. --[[User:Deathphoenix|Deathphoenix]] [[User_talk:Deathphoenix|'''ʕ''']] 02:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse deletion''': It's a pretty clear AfD. I hope the contributors can contribute their necessary ''information'' at the logical location. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 03:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Endorse''' --[[User:ChrisGriswold|Chris Griswold]] 23:30, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete endorsed''' AfD is clear, if there's nothing new to bring to this, delete should stand. Cannot corroborate claims of sockpuppetry. Very few voiced a keep, and I see established editors who wanted it deleted. It should remain deleted as the clear consensus of the AfD. [[User:Kevin Breitenstein|Kevin_b_er]] 02:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' The only reasons I got blocked were: |
|||
:1. AMIB is afraid of me and hates me. |
|||
:2. For AMIB to avoid getting blamed and blocked for his own vandalism (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pok%C3%A9mon_%28anime%29&diff=60275300&oldid=60275085]). |
|||
:Also, AMIB, you are abusing the word "cruft" -- Just because you hate cruft doesn't mean you can delete it all. Stop abusing the word "cruft" please. [[User:CoolKatt number 99999|CoolKatt number 99999]] 21:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::The reason you got blocked was because you repeatedly reinserted deleted content into another article to the detriment of that article, even using popups to do so. If you don't cut it out with the insane accusations and the general disruption, you can and will be blocked again. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 21:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::[[WP:CIVIL]]. [[User:CoolKatt number 99999|CoolKatt number 99999]] 22:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::You may also want to read [[WP:BP]], and be aware that I just explicitly stated that your spurious (that means baseless, FYI) accusations are quickly becoming disruptive. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In <font color="black">'''Bl♟ck'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|conspire]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|past ops]])</small> 04:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||