Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 70

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

DannyS712 bot 70

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 19:53, Thursday, April 9, 2020 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Replace use of outdated syntax highlighting syntax

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): phab:T241636, phab:T237267

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: ~9500 for source tags, unknown number for enclose but fewer

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Per phab:T237267, using "source" instead of "syntaxhighlight" is being deprecated and will be removed.This is a cosmetic edit in that the output shouldn't change, but is not prohibited under the policy because it will have a result in the end (source tags will eventually be removed, and if not replaced ahead of time won't work). Next week the patch that adds tracking categories for the uses will go live, and it should be clearer what the scope is in terms of number of edits. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

• Planning to take a look at this one. If another BAG member wants to take this BRFA and this comment is more than a day old or so, feel free to take it instead. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
• It looks like JJMC89 has been doing this manually. Is it still a problem that needs fixing (i.e. they just did a handful) or is the task complete? Primefac (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

  @Primefac: Category:Pages using deprecated source tags is currently at 2793, and caching issues mean that the actual number may be higher DannyS712 (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

  ...now 4799 DannyS712 (talk) 12:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

  {{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} DannyS712 (talk) 06:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

• Approved for trial (7 days or 50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Enterprisey (talk!) 15:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

  @Enterprisey: Trial complete. - 50 edits made DannyS712 (talk) 15:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

  That was fast!  Approved. No issues spotted. Enterprisey (talk!) 17:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.