Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2018 May 10: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:58, 10 May 2018

History of Balochistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Copyright violation started from this diff and it was removed recently with this diff. I am seeing thousands of words were copy pasted from books in form of "quotes" in references that are actually supposed to be short. Capitals00 (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same copyrights violating editor has now restored the copyright violation and provided a misleading edit summary.[1] Given he has been topic banned from uploading files for his copyright violations[2], I would urge admin to block him for his continued copyright violations. Capitals00 (talk) 06:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them. samee converse 09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Samee. Looks like a retaliatory request because of this. I could not find any copyright violations. These are just quotes inside the citations. They are not any more of a copyright violation than this. This is an article related to a content dispute between these users on Talk:Princely state, so the frustration from there is spilling over. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:39, 10 May 2018 edit Samee (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 25,302 edits cmt ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:58, 10 May 2018 edit undo JosephusOfJerusalem (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 905 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	* This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them. <span style="border:1px solid #e2a000;padding:1px;"> [[User:Samee\|<span style="color:#fff;background:#ea9000;"> samee </span>]][[User talk:Samee\|<span style="color:#fff;background:#ffb33a;"> converse </span>]]</span> 09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)		* This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them. <span style="border:1px solid #e2a000;padding:1px;"> [[User:Samee\|<span style="color:#fff;background:#ea9000;"> samee </span>]][[User talk:Samee\|<span style="color:#fff;background:#ffb33a;"> converse </span>]]</span> 09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
			* Agree with Samee. Looks like a retaliatory request because of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Capitals00&diff=prev&oldid=839049966 this]. I could not find any copyright violations. These are just quotes inside the citations. They are not any more of a copyright violation than [[1947_Poonch_rebellion#Notes\|this]]. This is an article related to a content dispute between these users on [[Talk:Princely state]], so the frustration from there is spilling over. [[User:JosephusOfJerusalem\|JosephusOfJerusalem]] ([[User talk:JosephusOfJerusalem\|talk]]) 09:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)