Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 April 25: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Astrotite: clarify
→‎Egersund IK: overturn and redelete
Line 11: Line 11:
*'''Overturn'''. Not speedy material to me. Although it's in the 4th division nowadays, the article indicates that the club was in the 2nd division in the 1940s and 50s. Too many itchy admins lately... Time to instate a '''speedy desysop''' procedure for stuff like this. That'll show'em! [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 09:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
*'''Overturn'''. Not speedy material to me. Although it's in the 4th division nowadays, the article indicates that the club was in the 2nd division in the 1940s and 50s. Too many itchy admins lately... Time to instate a '''speedy desysop''' procedure for stuff like this. That'll show'em! [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 09:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
*'''Copyvio?''' if the cached version is the same one it appears to be a more or less straight cut and paste from [http://www.egersund.info/fotball/english_history.html here] --[[Special:Contributions/82.7.40.7|82.7.40.7]] ([[User talk:82.7.40.7|talk]]) 10:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
*'''Copyvio?''' if the cached version is the same one it appears to be a more or less straight cut and paste from [http://www.egersund.info/fotball/english_history.html here] --[[Special:Contributions/82.7.40.7|82.7.40.7]] ([[User talk:82.7.40.7|talk]]) 10:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
*'''Overturn''' and then '''delete again''' as a copyvio; 82.7.40.7's hunch is correct. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 11:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


====[[:Astrotite]]====
====[[:Astrotite]]====

Revision as of 11:31, 25 April 2010

25 April 2010

Egersund IK

Egersund IK (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

This article was deleted per CSD#A7. I have asked the deleting administrator to reconsider, a request that was declined. The article created by a new editor and included a long history section that clearly showed that the club have been active for more than 90 years in Norway, and have made a not insignificant impact. The article needed work with references and wikification, but it was a great start and it certainly did not meet WP:CSD#A7. For the non-admins here, the article is cached at Google. Rettetast (talk) 08:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Overturn. Not speedy material to me. Although it's in the 4th division nowadays, the article indicates that the club was in the 2nd division in the 1940s and 50s. Too many itchy admins lately... Time to instate a speedy desysop procedure for stuff like this. That'll show'em! Pcap ping 09:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copyvio? if the cached version is the same one it appears to be a more or less straight cut and paste from here --82.7.40.7 (talk) 10:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Overturn and then delete again as a copyvio; 82.7.40.7's hunch is correct. Stifle (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Astrotite

Astrotite (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

A7 for a software article. This was raised during the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFA (file format). I've notified the admin who deleted this, but he isn't around. Pcap ping 05:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, it was closer to a G11 really. Any sources, perchance? Guy (Help!) 10:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Don't ask me. Since I take it had no sources, I've included it in that AfD, just in case. Some editors there think it's necessary to see the article to decide, but I don't. A temporary restoration might appease them. Pcap ping 10:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]