Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 September 27: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan: draftify |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The article was quickly removed for publicity. I unsubscribed on the article discussion page when I saw the deletion template, but no one gave any explanations and the article was deleted. There was no advertisement in the text, if the nominee did not like some of the phrases, it will not be difficult to delete them. The article is significant, please consider its restoration. Thanks. [[User:Namerst|Namerst]] ([[User talk:Namerst|talk]]) 11:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
The article was quickly removed for publicity. I unsubscribed on the article discussion page when I saw the deletion template, but no one gave any explanations and the article was deleted. There was no advertisement in the text, if the nominee did not like some of the phrases, it will not be difficult to delete them. The article is significant, please consider its restoration. Thanks. [[User:Namerst|Namerst]] ([[User talk:Namerst|talk]]) 11:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
*I have temporarily undeleted this. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 18:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
*I have temporarily undeleted this. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 18:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
*The deleted version was rather too much of a resume. If I had noticed it I would probably draftified it. I don't think it really had a G11 level of promotion, but it was not a well-written article. There should But if the statements included are accurate (I can't verify the sources in Russian) this person was probably notable. There should be no bar to creating a better version, preferably in draft space, or to undeleting and draftifing. So '''allow recreation''' or '''draftify'''. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 18:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:10, 27 September 2020
27 September 2020
Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan
The article was quickly removed for publicity. I unsubscribed on the article discussion page when I saw the deletion template, but no one gave any explanations and the article was deleted. There was no advertisement in the text, if the nominee did not like some of the phrases, it will not be difficult to delete them. The article is significant, please consider its restoration. Thanks. Namerst (talk) 11:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have temporarily undeleted this. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- The deleted version was rather too much of a resume. If I had noticed it I would probably draftified it. I don't think it really had a G11 level of promotion, but it was not a well-written article. There should But if the statements included are accurate (I can't verify the sources in Russian) this person was probably notable. There should be no bar to creating a better version, preferably in draft space, or to undeleting and draftifing. So allow recreation or draftify. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)