Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 September 27

27 September 2020

Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan

The article was quickly removed for publicity. I unsubscribed on the article discussion page when I saw the deletion template, but no one gave any explanations and the article was deleted. There was no advertisement in the text, if the nominee did not like some of the phrases, it will not be difficult to delete them. The article is significant, please consider its restoration. Thanks. Namerst (talk) 11:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

• I have temporarily undeleted this. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 18:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
• The deleted version was rather too much of a resume. If I had noticed it I would probably draftified it. I don't think it really had a G11 level of promotion, but it was not a well-written article. There should But if the statements included are accurate (I can't verify the sources in Russian) this person was probably notable. There should be no bar to creating a better version, preferably in draft space, or to undeleting and draftifing. So allow recreation or draftify. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 18:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the restoration. Please tell me, can you restore the text to the article and help remove advertising phrases? Namerst (talk) 18:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • I ask experienced participants for help. If someone has time, please help me correct the text. Many thanks. Namerst (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Not while this review is in progress, Namerst. After that, it depends on how this discussion is closed. But it is not just "some of the phrases" There need to be better sources, and it needs to read like an encyclopedia article, not a resume or a social media profile. From 1987 to 1989 – served in Border troops in USSR. is irrelevant and should go. The bulleted list of unreferened films and TV series should be at the least referenced, and preferably some paragraphs of prose added about at least some of these productions, bases on independent sources. The section on "Author of scientific articles and books" should select the more significant and influential ones, and demonstrate that influence by citing and quoting independent reviews, or stats on how often these papers are cited, or both. If there are high-quality English-language citations, some should be used. Provide translations of the titles and names of publications of non-English-language sources. And the help I could offer is limited because I can't read the sources. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • The temporary restoration is only to allow people in this discussion to see what the deleted article was like, it should not be edited at all during the discussion. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)