Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 April 28: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Open Book Collective: overturn |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:{{small|Pinging {{re|BoraVoro}}}} [[User talk:Mach61|Mach61]] 22:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
:{{small|Pinging {{re|BoraVoro}}}} [[User talk:Mach61|Mach61]] 22:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Overturn'''. [[WP:BADNAC]] clearly states: {{tq|A non-admin closure is not appropriate in any of the following situations: [...] The outcome is a close call [...] or likely to be controversial|quotes=y}}. Almost any No-consensus closure is bound to be a BADNAC. Whether the proposed redirect is a suitable ATD is something the re-closing admin should determine. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 22:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Overturn'''. [[WP:BADNAC]] clearly states: {{tq|A non-admin closure is not appropriate in any of the following situations: [...] The outcome is a close call [...] or likely to be controversial|quotes=y}}. Almost any No-consensus closure is bound to be a BADNAC. Whether the proposed redirect is a suitable ATD is something the re-closing admin should determine. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 22:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Overturn''' per above.—[[User talk:Alalch E.|Alalch E.]] 23:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:23, 28 April 2024
28 April 2024
Open Book Collective
This was admittedly a low-quorum discussion, but I don't think the arguments against redirection were any good at all. This article was created directly in mainspace by Flavoursofopen, a disclosed COI editor, against the WP:COIEDIT guideline (which I'm assuming they were unaware of). Of the two "keep" votes
- Myotus blindly asserts that
it appears notable enough
without linking any sources - Flavoursofopen's argument for keeping the article is that the OBC is legally separate from the possible redirect target (true, but irrelevant, a redirect would be kept at redirects for discussion).
Mach61 22:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Overturn. WP:BADNAC clearly states:
A non-admin closure is not appropriate in any of the following situations: [...] The outcome is a close call [...] or likely to be controversial
. Almost any No-consensus closure is bound to be a BADNAC. Whether the proposed redirect is a suitable ATD is something the re-closing admin should determine. Owen× ☎ 22:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) - Overturn per above.—Alalch E. 23:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)