Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alfonzo Green

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alfonzo Green (talk | contribs) at 23:37, 22 April 2014 (→‎User:Alfonzo Green). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Alfonzo Green

Alfonzo Green (talk · contribs) has been banned from articles related to Rupert Sheldrake under the terms of WP:ARB/PS. He also has a history of unproductive editing in other WP:FRINGE-related areas. This is his protest, in conteratvention of both his WP:TBAN and WP:STICK - an ill-written, incoherent rambling WP:TLDR anti-WP:CONSENSUS antiWP:FRINGE, anti-WP:MAINSTREAM, anti-Wikipedia rant which also contains various untrue allegations about editors. WP:NOTHERE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by Alfonzo Green

This is a case of WP:Wikihounding. Not satisfied with censoring me from the topic of Rupert Sheldrake, Barney is now trying to prevent me from expressing my views on my own user page. He is clearly tracking my edits and seems to want to remove me from Wikipedia altogether. My statement on my user page accurately describes my experience of being topic banned. Apparently he doesn't want the facts revealed.

I have a history of productive editing in science-related areas, including articles on genetic determinism, creodes, Ilya Prigogine and Mae-Wan Ho. My recent attention was devoted exclusively to Sheldrake, a well known scientist, in response to blatant efforts by Barney and other editors to negatively bias his biography page. Topic bans involve pages related to the topic and do not extend to the user's own page unless explicitly stated in the ruling. As to WP:STICK, I've made no effort to revive the debate. My sole objective in posting this material is to explain the events leading up to my topic ban, which I believe was not based on actual Wikipedia policy. I have the right to tell my side of the story. It's his right not to read it, as evidenced by WP:TLDR, but he doesn't have the right to prevent other editors from learning from my statement. In no way is it "incoherent rambling" or in opposition to any Wikipedia policies. In fact I make it clear that WP:CONSENSUS was ignored in the editing process and that Barney has consistently misused the WP:FRINGE charge against neutral editors. He still doesn't seem to understand that explaining Sheldrake's ideas on his biography page does not violate WP:FRINGE or WP:MAINSTREAM. That my statement is critical of Wikipedia in no way makes it an anti-Wikipedia rant. If Barney believes I've made false allegations against other editors, he should provide examples, though this will be difficult since everything in my statement is backed up with evidence. As to the last two charges, my intention is to bring the facts together into a single statement so as to educate Wikipedians about the potential for abuse of the editing process. Alfonzo Green (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barney should know better than to continue casting aspersions after receiving this warning on his talk page. Alfonzo Green (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]