Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Multiverse edits deleted: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Added }} at end
m Changed first line
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Medcombox/top|article=Multiverse edits deleted}}
{{subst = disputes
=== Multiverse edits deleted ===
{{RFMpointer|''The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.''}}


; Editors involved in this dispute
| parties = [jimjohnson2222] |parties = [Isambard Kingdom]
#{{user|Jimjohnson2222}} – ''filing party''
[Isambard Kingdom]


; Articles affected by this dispute
[[Multiverse]]


; Other attempts at [[Wikipedia:Resolving disputes|resolving this dispute]] that you have attempted
| articles = [[Multiverse]]



| links =
* [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Deletion_of_reference_on_laws_of_nature_and_fine-tuning_from_journal_submitted_by_Jim_Johnson]]
* [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Deletion_of_reference_on_laws_of_nature_and_fine-tuning_from_journal_submitted_by_Jim_Johnson]]


==== Issues to be mediated ====
| issues = deletion based on opinion rather than contents of material.I do not accept Isambad's logic for deleting my edits. The journal is online, indexed and respectable. The article required extensive research. I do not think Isambard Kingdom has read the material or understands it based on his comments which lack any specifics. As stated in my comments above,the plan would be to possibly insert references in other related articles.Jim Johnson 14:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
{{RFMpointer|''What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.''}}

; Primary issues (added by the filing party)
deletion based on opinion rather than contents of material.I do not accept Isambad's logic for deleting my edits. The journal is online, indexed and respectable. The article required extensive research. I do not think Isambard Kingdom has read the material or understands it based on his comments which lack any specifics. As stated in my comments above,the plan would be to possibly insert references in other related articles.Jim Johnson 14:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Jim Johnson 17:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Jim Johnson 17:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


'''Comment''' Is it possible that this request has not been properly submitted, and, therefore, not registering as a request needing mediation? I'm not sure, myself, since I've never submitted a form like this. [[User:Isambard Kingdom|Isambard Kingdom]] ([[User talk:Isambard Kingdom|talk]]) 15:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
'''Comment''' Is it possible that this request has not been properly submitted, and, therefore, not registering as a request needing mediation? I'm not sure, myself, since I've never submitted a form like this. [[User:Isambard Kingdom|Isambard Kingdom]] ([[User talk:Isambard Kingdom|talk]]) 15:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
I changed subject to subst and will try but do not know what it stands for. Jim Johnson 23:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
I changed subject to subst and will try but do not know what it stands for. Jim Johnson 23:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

}}
; Additional issues (added by other parties)
*Additional issue 1
*Additional issue 2

==== Parties' agreement to mediation ====
{{RFMpointer|''If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.''}}

#Agree. Jim Johnson 00:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
#

====Decision of the Mediation Committee====
{{RFMpointer|''This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide#Accepted requests|accepted]] (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide#Rejected requests|rejected]] (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.''}}
*

{{Medcombox/bottom}}<noinclude>[[Category:Mediation Committee pending cases|Sample]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 00:27, 21 November 2016

Multiverse edits deleted

Editors involved in this dispute
  1. Jimjohnson2222 (talk · contribs) – filing party

[Isambard Kingdom]

Articles affected by this dispute

Multiverse

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Issues to be mediated

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

deletion based on opinion rather than contents of material.I do not accept Isambad's logic for deleting my edits. The journal is online, indexed and respectable. The article required extensive research. I do not think Isambard Kingdom has read the material or understands it based on his comments which lack any specifics. As stated in my comments above,the plan would be to possibly insert references in other related articles.Jim Johnson 14:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC) Jim Johnson 17:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Comment Is it possible that this request has not been properly submitted, and, therefore, not registering as a request needing mediation? I'm not sure, myself, since I've never submitted a form like this. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC) I changed subject to subst and will try but do not know what it stands for. Jim Johnson 23:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

  1. Agree. Jim Johnson 00:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee