Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bodiadub: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 35: Line 35:
====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
*Note that Asketbouncer was (in appeal after block in this case) CUed by [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asketbouncer&diff=1047946463&oldid=1047202537 Yamla] (further check by [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Asketbouncer&diff=1049247647&oldid=1048531488 SQL]), both CUs concurring they are {{confirmed}} to {{checkuser|1=Golden Ranky}}. I was skeptical of CU being useful here, but it did confirm that account, so there might be other crosses here.--'''[[User:Eostrix |<span style="background-color: black; color: yellow">Eostrix</span>]]'''&nbsp;([[User talk:Eostrix|<sub>hoot, hoot!</sub>]]) 19:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 19:39, 15 October 2021

Bodiadub

Bodiadub (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.


11 October 2021

– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.

Suspected sockpuppets

Unlocked but stale:

Usual modus operandi of Bodiadub's cross-wiki PR spam: Update an Ukrainian article with promotional spam and then create a perfect English translation full of spammy PR phrasing, usually done with visual editing. There are other telltale signs which experienced folks here should know about, but due to WP:BEANS I won't be saying much more here. uk:User:Кен Гінг created the uk.wiki version of Igor Mezencev just last month, which was then created by Ofkro Trun this month. Ofkro Trun also created the spammy-looking Marco Cervetti as a "translation." HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 06:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • It's them. I haven't followed this through except to request locking. MER-C 08:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk endorsed for a sleeper check if practical; I trust MER-C's judgment here. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've blocked a lot of socks over the last two weeks, which I have listed above. I don't expect anything useful to turn up but they've been sitting on SRG unactioned for up to two weeks now. Putting them here may get them locked faster. MER-C 16:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]