Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freakee73

Freakee73

Freakee73 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Freakee73/Archive.

Report date May 9 2010, 16:53 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• AK isaprick (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• F.U.A.K. (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 213.239.192.110 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• AKsockpuppet (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Ibbn

Appears to have admitted it here. Ibn (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

All right, here we go. This is what I was hoping for actually, and maybe now this will be given the attention that it deserves, and a proper investigation, and not just the typical block. It seems that there can be more to a story than the average Wikipedia administrator can imagine. I would love to have a competent administrator look at this case and evaluate it properly. Maybe a week or so ago, I lost my editing rights due to an editor, User:GPHEMSLEY reporting me for having sockpuppet accounts. I tried to explain at the time that I had used no other accounts, other than the ones that were my IP addresses. I stated which those were on my talk page for freakee73. I had gone through being blocked before, and regained my account, all of which is detailed on my talk page. I agreed to make no more disruptive edits, and until yesterday I had not. This is all an orchestrated move to gain some sort of legitimacy for a certain Adam Kontras, I have no idea how the check-user could believe me to be all of those other names other than Hemsley (who as Adam Kontras' website points out is Kontras' own personal 'Web Guru') He could be such the guru as to jack an ip address or something of that sort. I did find a keylogger on my system a bit over a month ago. This is all a conspiracy to silence anyone who interjects anything into a page that could degrade Kontras' self created worth.

I hate to accuse other editors, but it is what it is. I have been accused of some fairly wretched things over the past month or so. Every time I defended myself I identified myself, just check the histories of pages that I was involved. I being freakee73, or the two IP addresses that I had access. Now this may require a bit of investigation, so that is why I call for a competent editor, and not a block happy rouge that will accomplish nothing. The people that have accused me are turning Wikipedia into a social networking site, I would love to see it become a true source of information, and would love to have my account back. The edits I was making were very accurate and well done if I do say so myself.

Just to clarify, the socks listed above are me, absolutely, but not the others that I was accused of in the past. I simply decided that if I were going to be accused of something then I should be damned for something I actually am doing, So it appears that this is war! Fix it! Find the truth! Charles F Groves III Richmond, VA 95.211.27.5 (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Added F.U.A.K. (didn't see that one listed in the archived cases). Usernames are clearly violation also (his actions are against someone with initials "A K". This is becoming a long-term/repetitive problem; could CU find us other sleepers and maybe a static-IP to block? DMacks (talk) 18:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Checkuser request – code letter: B + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)

Current status – Self-endorsed by clerk for Checkuser attention.

Self-endorsing for CheckUser attention. Yes, this person is starting to create some rather significant problems which seems to including IP and proxy-hopping. –MuZemike 22:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

---