Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hidden Tempo: Difference between revisions
Hidden Tempo (talk | contribs) m Grammar fix |
CU declined as they admit it above. Sock blocked, master blocked for topic ban evasion |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===17 February 2017=== |
===17 February 2017=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|CUdeclined}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Declined CU as unnecessary given Hidden Tempo admits the socking (see above). Sock blocked as an account created to evade a topic ban. Master blocked for topic ban evasion. -- [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 19:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 19:16, 17 February 2017
Hidden Tempo
- Hidden Tempo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
17 February 2017
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
Suspected sockpuppets
- The Patriot Way (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Hidden Tempo is topic-banned from American Politics - The Patriot Way shows up shortly thereafter, and the two crossed their accounts here and here. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Thanks for immediately reporting this possible infraction, NorthBySouthBaranof. I didn't realize I was still logged into my other account, The Patriot Way, when I made the last edit. Usually I'm pretty good about not giving tendentious activist editors a reason to get rid of me, but today I was careless and forgot to log out first. So, it seems that in addition to "informing" people with whom you disagree that they don't know how the world works[1], failing to ever add material that could reflect negatively upon one group of individuals (which I am banned from mentioning by name), and never making an edit that reflects positively upon another group (also banned from mentioning), you may be able to actually further cleanse the project from views that differ from your own by pouncing on an opportunity to use a roundabout backdoor method to simply get rid of one of these editors altogether. If I'm to be perfectly honest, I can't blame you - it's a rather neat and efficient strategy to promote your own worldview and silence dissent. But really, it'd be much more respectable to simply have a real debate. Cheers! Hidden Tempo (talk) 01:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Declined CU as unnecessary given Hidden Tempo admits the socking (see above). Sock blocked as an account created to evade a topic ban. Master blocked for topic ban evasion. -- Euryalus (talk) 19:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)