Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OberRanks: Difference between revisions
DrFleischman (talk | contribs) |
Declining checkuser |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===18 October 2017=== |
===18 October 2017=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|decline}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*{{Decline}} - We cannot use CU to connect named accounts and IPs, so I'm declining the CU request. However, I think it's worth asking - {{u|OberRanks}}, is this IP you or anyone you might know? [[User:GeneralizationsAreBad|GAB]]<sup>[[User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad|gab]]</sup> 23:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 23:16, 18 October 2017
OberRanks
- OberRanks (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
18 October 2017
– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
Suspected sockpuppets
- 2600:387:3:805:0:0:0:67 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
2600:387:3:805:0:0:0:67 recently chimed in at Talk:Lion Guard, making the same evidence-free COI accusation that OberRanks has been making (example here), and perhaps trying to gain an upper hand in the discussion. Geolocates to Baltimore, Maryland. OberRanks has made multiple comments referring to an off-wiki connection to Maryland (specifically, having communicated directly with the Maryland Republican Party, which has nothing to do with the subject of the article, examples here, here). The geographical nexus could be a coincidence but it would be a very odd one indeed. FYI Husnock is a legitimate alternate (retired) account of OberRanks. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk declined - We cannot use CU to connect named accounts and IPs, so I'm declining the CU request. However, I think it's worth asking - OberRanks, is this IP you or anyone you might know? GABgab 23:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)