Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pioneercourthouse: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎CheckUser requests: looking at this now
CU results
Line 30: Line 30:


======<span style="font-size:150%"> CheckUser requests </span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%"> CheckUser requests </span>======
{{RFCU| E | B | inprogress }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by [[User:Katr67|Katr67]] ([[User talk:Katr67|talk]]) 08:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC) </small>
{{RFCU| E | B | Checked }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by [[User:Katr67|Katr67]] ([[User talk:Katr67|talk]]) 08:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC) </small>
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##-->
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##-->
<!--## Codeletters are:
<!--## Codeletters are:
Line 43: Line 43:
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======
:PioneerCourthouse is definitely back which means occasional sleeper checks are necessary. Agree that some of the phrasing by Ballaucus is very similar. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 12:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
:PioneerCourthouse is definitely back which means occasional sleeper checks are necessary. Agree that some of the phrasing by Ballaucus is very similar. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman;">[[User:Wknight94|<span style="color: #EE5B0D;">Wknight94</span>]] [[User talk:Wknight94|<sup style="color: blue;">talk</sup>]]</span> 12:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

{{confirmed}} {{Checkuser|Pioneercourthouse}} =
* {{checkuser|Lanceopoorman}}
* {{checkuser|Dellhungarman}}
* {{checkuser|Luycasperflogger}}
* {{checkuser|Peopleeyoyo}}
* {{checkuser|Copistopplayer}}
* {{checkuser|Ballaucus}}<br />

The last one is not on the same ISP as the others, but it geolocates to the ''exact'' same place, and his contribs line up. Furthermore, the other accounts show that he is capable of editing from very - interesting - ISPs, so I am not willing to accept that difference. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 18:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)




======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Conclusions </span>======

Revision as of 18:17, 12 November 2009

Pioneercourthouse

Pioneercourthouse (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


Report date November 12 2009, 08:14 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Katr67

Copistopplayer already blocked. Same MO as the others--background is here. Ballaucus recently marked "not related" but please check against ip of Copistopplayer as they both emerged recently. Luycasperflogger is a "new user" who responded on Ballaucus' talk page. Let me know if you need more diffs, but this is *yawn* the same old same old. Please check for sleeper socks. Copistopplayer was created over a month ago in order to get around semi-protection at Pioneer Courthouse Square. Katr67 (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.

Sir or Madam,

I entreat you to please not further violate my deeply guarded privacy by inspecting my ip address for supposed connections to a "fiend." As has already been determined, I am an unrelated user of this fine project. Although my speech may be somewhat stilted and perhaps excessively mellifulous, it is thusly so because of the manner in which I was raised. In this manner, I do speak and write. I do sincerely believe that I may be a victim of retaliatory "checkusers" and certain gentleman withinthis encyclopedia (or shall I say "apparent fiends") are attempting to link me with a true "fiend." As privacy is a closely guarded notion within this project, I entreat you to not allow certain individuals to continually link me with a certain "fiend." Please allow me to continue forward upon my peaceful way and no longer be subjected to excessive retaliation. I should emphasize, however, that perhaps this apparent "relation" is in some way a good-faith effort to rid ourselves of those who would do the project harm. I remain willing and able to work with those who needlessly accuse me for the betterment of this encyclopedia. While I entreat you to please not inspect my ip address and violate my deeply held privacy, if you do choose do so in any event, I am hopeful that you will fully and completely EMPHASIZE that I am not linked to any "fiend" within this project. As you make your decision on this fine day, I invite you to inspect my edits. I have made no wrongful edits, and while my statements may be somewhat colorful, I have clearly contributed to the betterment of this community. I await your kind response. Thank you very kindly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballaucus (talk • contribs) 15:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Circumstantial factors concerning Ballaucus - first, s/he has an edit summary style that's similar to Pioneercourthouse's (an abundance of "disgusting", for instance), and second, s/he was asking tedder here to remove what s/he termed "utterly non-notable" information from articles, which rather ties in with what people have been telling PCH about the text about homeless people (the difference here being, of course, that the school fires information is sourced, unlike the homeless people information). PCH has a history of experimenting with various writing styles that don't quite work (for instance this rather poor attempt to look like a foreigner) and there is something about the super-formal style of Ballaucus that just doesn't ring true to me. Again, all circumstantial, and if the SPI came up with not related I guess it could all be a coincidence. --bonadea contributions talk 09:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E  + B (Community ban/sanction evasion and ongoing serious pattern vandalism)
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Katr67 (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
PioneerCourthouse is definitely back which means occasional sleeper checks are necessary. Agree that some of the phrasing by Ballaucus is very similar. Wknight94 talk 12:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Pioneercourthouse (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) =

The last one is not on the same ISP as the others, but it geolocates to the exact same place, and his contribs line up. Furthermore, the other accounts show that he is capable of editing from very - interesting - ISPs, so I am not willing to accept that difference. J.delanoygabsadds 18:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Conclusions
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse&oldid=325474540"