Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/REX/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It seems that a certain group of users who are (un)involved in that arb. case with me show only respect to the "ignore all rules" principle. I need someone to help me parse the [[User:Matia.gr/Evidence]] I've gathered in the past and someone to search for more evidence. I don't think I can do it on my own. [[User:Matia.gr|+MATIA]] <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|☎]]</small> 10:11, 20 October 2005 (UTC) |
It seems that a certain group of users who are (un)involved in that arb. case with me show only respect to the "ignore all rules" principle. I need someone to help me parse the [[User:Matia.gr/Evidence]] I've gathered in the past and someone to search for more evidence. I don't think I can do it on my own. [[User:Matia.gr|+MATIA]] <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|☎]]</small> 10:11, 20 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
:See also [[Talk:Macedonians_%28ethnic_group%29#totallydisputed]]. [[User:Matia.gr|+MATIA]] <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|☎]]</small> 12:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC) |
:See also [[Talk:Macedonians_%28ethnic_group%29#totallydisputed]]. [[User:Matia.gr|+MATIA]] <small>[[User talk:Matia.gr|☎]]</small> 12:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
::+MATIA, that [[Talk:Macedonian Slavs/Poll|naming poll]] was a draw (fifty fifty). It was not a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Consensi require at least 60% support. The name Macedonian Slavs which you are advocating is not in consensus like you seem to think (God knows why). However, a consensus reached to avoid naming conflicts [[Wikipedia:Naming conflict#Dealing with self-identifying terms|here]] can and should be used in the dispute that you are referring to and that supports the use of the name Macedonians. The "ignore all rules" principle in this case is observed only by you as you are defying the consensus on [[Wikipedia:Naming conflict#Dealing with self-identifying terms|naming conflicts]]. [[User:GrandfatherJoe|GrandfatherJoe]] ([[User talk:GrandfatherJoe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GrandfatherJoe|contribs]]) 13:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:32, 20 October 2005
It seems that a certain group of users who are (un)involved in that arb. case with me show only respect to the "ignore all rules" principle. I need someone to help me parse the User:Matia.gr/Evidence I've gathered in the past and someone to search for more evidence. I don't think I can do it on my own. +MATIA ☎ 10:11, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- See also Talk:Macedonians_(ethnic_group)#totallydisputed. +MATIA ☎ 12:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- +MATIA, that naming poll was a draw (fifty fifty). It was not a consensus. Consensi require at least 60% support. The name Macedonian Slavs which you are advocating is not in consensus like you seem to think (God knows why). However, a consensus reached to avoid naming conflicts here can and should be used in the dispute that you are referring to and that supports the use of the name Macedonians. The "ignore all rules" principle in this case is observed only by you as you are defying the consensus on naming conflicts. GrandfatherJoe (talk • contribs) 13:32, 20 October 2005 (UTC)