Jump to content

Strobiloideae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 05:52, 23 January 2021 (Misc citation tidying. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Historically recognized angiosperm taxa‎ | via #UCB_Category 82/85). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Strobiloideae are an obsolete taxonomic name, a subclass of both Monocotyledons and Dicotyledons proposed by Charles Bessey in 1915 in his taxonomic classification of plants.[1] In this sense by not being unique it breaks the rules of botanical nomenclature as currently used, however Bessey actually used a qualifying hyphenation (Alternifoliae-Strobiloideae and Oppositifoliae-Strobiloideae), a distinction not always recognised in reference to this scheme.

Bessey believed in the strobiloid theory of plant evolution that postulated that the Angiospermae (flowering plants) originated from Cycadophyta, and that flowers originated from a primitive vegetative shoot that developed into a structure with perianth, stamens and carpels. From this arose two lines, the Strobiloideae (or Ranalian line) with connation of like parts and the Cotyloideae (or Rosalian line) with connation of unlike parts, which he assigned as the two subclasses of monocots (called Alternifoliae by Bessey), but also of dicots (called Oppositifoliae by Bessey).

Subdivisions

The Alternifoliae Strobiloideae had five orders, arranged as follows:

of these, the Alismatales were considered the most primitive.

while the Oppositifoliae Strobiloideae had fourteen arranged in three superorders:

  • 2 classis Oppositifoliae
    1 superordo Apopetalae-Polycarpellatae
    2 superordo Sympetalae-Polycarpellatae
    3 superordo Sympetalae-Dicarpellatae

References

  1. ^ Bessey, Charles E. (Feb–Apr 1915). "The Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Flowering Plants". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 2 (1/2): 109–164. doi:10.2307/2990030. JSTOR 2990030.

Sources