Jump to content

Porn studies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 19:22, 16 July 2022 (Add: year. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | Category:Sexology | #UCB_Category 55/77). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For the journal, see Porn Studies (journal).

Porn studies is the critical academic study of pornography and its associated industry, typically in the broader rubric of the field of sexuality studies.[1] Porn studies takes as its object of research pornography itself — its visual artefacts, cultural role, controversies, and influence on the public[2] — as well as the manner in which pornography is researched.[3] The development of porn studies as a field of academia has been driven by the publication of the same name.

Subjects

Areas and themes that scholars of porn studies, as a field, may focus on include: gay pornography and how it reproduces idealized pictures of masculinity,[4] the uses of pornographic comics by Japanese women, the proliferation of amateur porn sparked by the Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee video, interraciality in the porn industry, and more.[citation needed]

The field of porn studies situates itself in the broader field of critical studies. In doing so, it aims to "unpack what is at stake in the construction of particular views and practices... draw[ing] on insights from disciplines that acknowledge the complexity of culture and are aware of the shifts and continuities in the ways that sex and media are constructed historically."[5] The critical approach includes an enquiry into the types of theoretical tools suggested by different forms of analysis, and how the questions one asks influence the research that is produced.[citation needed]

Studies

A Danish study showed that the availability of pornography reduces the incidents of at least some sexual crimes.[6]

A 2009 study found that often perceived link between pornography and sexual violence was non-existent.[7]

In 2010, a study found that men who watch pornography were more likely to be dissatisfied with their sex lives, although the reverse was true for women;[8] heterosexual couples who watch pornography together were more likely to report higher levels of sexual satisfaction and dedication than those who viewed it alone.[9]

A 2016 study found that those who regularly watch pornography are more likely to divorce, although the study did not determine if viewing pornography was a cause for the divorce or a symptom of other problems.[10]

Theoretical foundations

The philosophical foundation of the discipline porn studies is social constructivism. Thus, scholars of porn studies are not as interested in empirical questions about the effects of pornography on society — which traditionally cover issues like the links between the consumption of pornography and undesired behavioral and social outcomes;[11][12] whether or not pornography is a public health problem;[13] or whether pornography may have positive social benefits[14] — but instead on questions surrounding how norms shape what is actually researched.[3]

This approach to enquiry is opposed to positivist approaches in social science which "obscures the subjective, ideological and normative dimension of scientific paradigms."[3]

Criticism

Scholars of porn studies may encounter opposition from college and university administrators who are concerned about the consequences of exposing students to potentially obscene material in a typical course. Such concerns include the age of consent of the students viewing the material, and potential legal ramifications.[1] Critics of violence in hardcore pornography have also raised objections to the discipline as a whole for its alleged role in perpetuating the damaging effects of porn.[citation needed]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Noble, Bobby (2 January 2014). "Porn's pedagogies: teaching porn studies in the academic–corporate complex". Porn Studies. 1 (1–2): 96–113. doi:10.1080/23268743.2013.863658.
  2. ^ Williams, Linda, ed. (June 2012). Porn Studies. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-8584-4. OCLC 1148080779.[page needed]
  3. ^ a b c Gouvernet, Brice; Hentati, Yassamine; Rebelo, Maria Teresa; Rezrazi, Amine; Sebbe, Fabrice; Combaluzier, Serge (2 April 2020). "Porn studies or pornology? Network analysis of the keywords of scientific articles published between 2006 and 2017". Porn Studies. 7 (2): 228–246. doi:10.1080/23268743.2019.1615378. S2CID 210377976.
  4. ^ Mercer, John . (13 March 2017). Gay porn : representations of masculinity in contemporary gay pornography. ISBN 978-1-78076-517-4. OCLC 921183059.[page needed]
  5. ^ Smith, Clarissa; Attwood, Feona (2 January 2014). "Anti/pro/critical porn studies". Porn Studies. 1 (1–2): 7–23. doi:10.1080/23268743.2014.887364.
  6. ^ Kutchinsky, Berl (July 1973). "The Effect of Easy Availability of Pornography on the Incidence of Sex Crimes: The Danish Experience". Journal of Social Issues. 29 (3): 163–181. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00094.x.
  7. ^ Ferguson, Christopher J.; Hartley, Richard D. (1 September 2009). "The pleasure is momentary…the expense damnable?: The influence of pornography on rape and sexual assault". Aggression and Violent Behavior. 14 (5): 323–329. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.04.008.
  8. ^ Bridges, Ana J.; Morokoff, Patricia J. (December 2011). "Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples". Personal Relationships. 18 (4): 562–585. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01328.x.
  9. ^ Maddox, Amanda M.; Rhoades, Galena K.; Markman, Howard J. (April 2011). "Viewing Sexually-Explicit Materials Alone or Together: Associations with Relationship Quality". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 40 (2): 441–448. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4. PMC 2891580. PMID 20039112.
  10. ^ Perry, Samuel L. (August 2018). "Pornography Use and Marital Separation: Evidence from Two-Wave Panel Data". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 47 (6): 1869–1880. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1080-8. PMID 28936726. S2CID 4055477.
  11. ^ Wagwau, A. Jamesa (2016). Examining the Link Between Sexually Explicit Media use and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Adolescents and Young Adults (Thesis). West Virginia University Libraries. doi:10.33915/etd.6884.
  12. ^ Weaver, James B.; Weaver, Stephanie Sargent; Mays, Darren; Hopkins, Gary L.; Kannenberg, Wendi; McBride, Duane (March 2011). "Mental‐ and Physical‐Health Indicators and Sexually Explicit Media Use Behavior by Adults". The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 8 (3): 764–772. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02030.x. PMID 20946159.
  13. ^ Perrin, Paul C.; Madanat, Hala N.; Barnes, Michael D.; Carolan, Athena; Clark, Robert B.; Ivins, Natasha; Tuttle, Steven R.; Vogeler, Heidi A.; Williams, Patrick N. (March 2008). "Health education's role in framing pornography as a public health issue: local and national strategies with international implications". Promotion & Education. 15 (1): 11–18. doi:10.1177/1025382307088093. PMID 18430690. S2CID 43459471.
  14. ^ Döring, Nicola M. (September 2009). "The Internet's impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15years of research". Computers in Human Behavior. 25 (5): 1089–1101. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.003.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Porn_studies&oldid=1098630840"