Jump to content

Re Conegrade Ltd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Smasongarrison (talk | contribs) at 00:01, 5 April 2023 (Removing from Category:2002 in case law using Cat-a-lot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Re Conegrade Ltd
CourtCourt of Appeal of England and Wales
Citations[2002] EWHC 2411 (Ch), [2003] BPIR 358
Keywords
Insolvency, voidable transaction

Re Conegrade Ltd or Saxton v Clarke [2002] EWHC 2411 (Ch) is a UK insolvency law case, concerning voidable transactions.

Facts

[edit]

Conegrade Ltd was a small engineering company. It had four directors, two of which were Mr and Mrs Clarke. Conegrade Ltd had a loan account, which included debts for loans by directors to the company. All board members attended a vote, and voted in favour, of selling a freehold property in Station Road, Uppingham, worth £125,000 to Mr and Mrs Clarke. These two directors would then lease the property back to the company, but they paid only £64,808, which was the balance in the loan account. This settled a debt owed by the company to the Clarkes. Conegrade Ltd was insolvent within a year or so. The liquidators argued the transaction was a preference under IA 1986 section 239.

Judgment

[edit]

Lloyd J held that the only compelling reason for the transfer was the rightly presumed desire to place Mr and Mrs Clarke in a better position, above the creditors.[1]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ A Dignam and J Lowry, Company Law (2012) 476

References

[edit]