Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.
| Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued April 28, 1999 Decided June 22, 1999 | |
| Full case name | Karen Sutton and Kimberly Hinton, Petitioners v. United Air Lines, Inc. |
| Docket no. | 97-1943 |
| Citations | 527 U.S. 471 (more) |
| Case history | |
| Subsequent | Overturned by Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Justice O'Connor |
| Laws applied | |
| Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 | |
Superseded by | |
| ADA Amendments Act of 2008 | |
Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 22, 1999. The Court decided that mitigating measures should be taken into account when determining whether one's impairment constitutes a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). The holding of this case was later overturned by the passage of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.[1][2]
Background
Twins Karen Sutton and Kimberly Hinton suffered from severe myopia. Their uncorrected visual acuity was 20/200, but with corrective lenses, both were able to function normally. They applied to United Air Lines to be commercial airline pilots, but were rejected by the company due to their uncorrected vision being worse than 20/100. The twins then filed suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). The District Court dismissed the complaint, partially holding that the plaintiffs could not be considered “disabled” because their impairment could be fully corrected. The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed.[3][4]
Decision
In a 7–2 decision delivered by Justice O’Connor, the Court affirmed, holding that “the determination of whether an individual is disabled should be made with reference to measures that mitigate the individual's impairment, including, in this instance, eyeglasses and contact lenses.” [5]
Subsequent History
The ADA Amendments Act was passed in 2008 in response to controversial Supreme Court decisions, including Sutton and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, that narrowed the definition of disability under the ADA.[2][6] According to the "Findings and Purposes" section of the Act, "the holdings of the Supreme Court in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) and its companion cases have narrowed the broad scope of protection intended to be afforded by the ADA, thus eliminating protection for many individuals whom Congress intended to protect."[6]
See also
- Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
- ADA Amendments Act of 2008
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 527
References
- ^ Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999)
- ^ a b "Questions and Answers about the Department of Justice's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Implement the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008". archive.ada.gov. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
- ^ "Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999)". Justia Law. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
- ^ "Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc." Oyez, www.oyez.org/cases/1998/97-1943. Accessed 6 Sep. 2023.
- ^ 527 U.S. at 475.
- ^ a b "ADA AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2008". US EEOC. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
External links
- Text of Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)