Jump to content

Delisle v Canada (Deputy AG)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anjunaedit (talk | contribs) at 08:05, 26 December 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Delisle v Canada (Deputy AG)
Supreme Court of Canada
Hearing: October 7, 1998
Judgment: September 2, 1999
Citations[1999] 2 SCR 989
Docket No.25926[1]
RulingDelisle appeal dismissed
Court membership
Chief Justice: Antonio Lamer
Puisne Justices: Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin, Frank Iacobucci, John C. Major, Michel Bastarache, Ian Binnie
Reasons given
MajorityBastarache J, joined by Gonthier, McLachlin and Major JJ
ConcurrenceL'Heureux-Dubé J
DissentCory and Iacobucci JJ

Delisle v Canada (Deputy AG), [1999] 2 SCR 989 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on the freedom of association guarantee under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court defined the freedom as only applying to individuals and not associations themselves. Accordingly, they found the exclusion of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from the public services legislation did not violate section 2(d).

Gaétan Delisle was a member of the RCMP and president of an RCMP labour association. He brought a challenge to the federal Public Service Staff Relations Act (PSSRA) and part of the Canada Labour Code on the grounds it violated his right to association.

Bastarache J, writing for the majority, held that the PSSRA did not violate the Charter because it did not affect members of the RCMP from forming their own independent associations. He further ruled that, "The fundamental freedoms protected by s. 2 of the Charter do not impose a positive obligation of protection or inclusion on Parliament or the government, except perhaps in exceptional circumstances which are not at issue here."[2]

Note that much of this case has been overruled by Health Services v BC (2007)

See also

Notes

  1. ^ SCC Case Information - Docket 25926 Supreme Court of Canada
  2. ^ para. 33