Jump to content

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legalskeptic (talk | contribs) at 14:07, 28 December 2018 (removed link from lead citation per WP:SCOTUS/SG; citation tweaks; fleshed out infobox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers
Argued November 28, 2017
Decided February 21, 2018
Full case nameDigital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Paul Somers
Docket no.16-1276
Citations583 U.S. ___ (more)
138 S. Ct. 767; 200 L. Ed. 2d 15
Case history
Prior850 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2017); cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 2300 (2017).
SubsequentOn remand, 886 F.3d 1300 (9th Cir. 2018).
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinions
MajorityGinsburg, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
ConcurrenceSotomayor, joined by Breyer
ConcurrenceThomas, joined by Alito, Gorsuch

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that "whistleblower" status and associated protections as defined by Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank only apply in cases where the whistleblower has reported malfeasance directly to the Securities and Exchange Commission.[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved 14 August 2018.