Skipper v. South Carolina
| Skipper v. South Carolina | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 24th, 1986 Decided April 29, 1986 | |
| Full case name | Skipper v. South Carolina |
| Citations | 476 U.S. 1 (more) 106 S. Ct. 1669; 90 L. Ed. 2d 1; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 145 |
| Holding | |
| The trial court's exclusion from the sentencing hearing of the testimony of the jailers and the visitor denied petitioner his right to place before the sentencing jury all relevant evidence in mitigation of punishment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | White, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor |
| Concurrence | Powell, joined by Burger, Rehnquist |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV | |
Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the rule from Lockett v. Ohio (1978) dictated that mitigating evidence not be subject to limitations based on relevance.
Background
Ronald DeRay Skipper was convicted of capital murder and rape in South Carolina. During the penalty phase of his bifurcated trial, as required by Gregg v. Georgia (1976), Skipper sought to introduce as mitigating evidence that he had "adjusted well" to his pre-trial incarceration. The trial court ruled the evidence irrelevant, in keeping with controlling South Carolina caselaw, excluded the evidence. Skipper was subsequently sentenced to death.
Holding
The Court held that, under Lockett, the exclusion of mitigating evidence on relevance grounds, as articulated by the South Carolina Supreme Court, violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments and vacated the sentence.
See also
External links
- Text of Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)