Taylor v. United States (2016)
| Taylor v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 23, 2016 Decided June 20, 2016 | |
| Full case name | David Anthony Taylor, Petitioner v. United States |
| Docket no. | 14–6166 |
| Citations | 579 U.S. ___ (more) 136 S. Ct. 2074; 195 L. Ed. 2d 456 |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Case history | |
| Prior | United States v. Taylor, 754 F.3d 217 (4th Cir. 2014) |
| Holding | |
| In a federal criminal prosecution under the Hobbs Act, the government is not required to prove an interstate commerce element beyond a reasonable doubt. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Alito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan |
| Dissent | Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
| Hobbs Act | |
Taylor v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that in a federal criminal prosecution under the Hobbs Act, the government is not required to prove an interstate commerce element beyond a reasonable doubt.[1][2] The Court relied on the decision in Gonzales v. Raich which held that Congress has the authority to regulate the marijuana market given that even local activities can have a "substantial effect" on interstate commerce.
Background
David Anthony Taylor performed two home-invasion robberies with the intent of stealing from two perceived marijuana dealers in Virginia. When initially tried in federal court, the jury deadlocked because of arguments that the marijuana in question was grown and intended for use within Virginia. Taylor was then retried where the judge precluded that line of argument and convicted. The high court upheld that conviction.
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Samuel Alito authored the majority opinion.[2]
References
- ^ SCOTUSblog coverage
- ^ a b Taylor v. United States, No. 14–6166, 579 U.S. ____ (2016).
External links
- Text of Taylor v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
- SCOTUSblog coverage
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |