R v Storrey
| R v Story | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Hearing: 3 November 1989 Judgment: 15 February 1990 | |
| Full case name | Ronald Percy Storrey, Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen, Respondent |
| Citations | [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241 |
| Docket No. | 19725 [1] |
| Prior history | on appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario |
| Ruling | The appeal should be dismissed. |
| Court membership | |
| Reasons given | |
| Unanimous reasons by | Cory, J. |
R v Story [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the authority of police officers to make an arrest. The Court added another requirement that, in addition to an officer's subjective belief that there are reasonable and probable grounds for arrest, the grounds must be justifiable from an objective point of view.
In his judgement, Cory J. followed R v Brown (1987 NSCA) and Liversidge v Anderson in stating:[2]
- ...the Criminal Code requires that an arresting officer must subjectively have reasonable and probable grounds on which to base the arrest. Those grounds must, in addition, be justifiable from an objective point of view. That is to say, a reasonable person placed in the position of the officer must be able to conclude that there were indeed reasonable and probable grounds for the arrest. On the other hand, the police need not demonstrate anything more than reasonable and probable grounds. Specifically, they are not required to establish a prima facie case for conviction before making the arrest.
References
- ^ SCC Case Information - Docket 19725 Supreme Court of Canada
- ^ canlii.org: R. v. Storrey, (1990) 1 SCR 241, 1990 CanLII 125 (SCC)
External links
- Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision at LexUM and CanLII
.svg){kind=small}  | This article about Canadian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |