Jump to content

Radcliffe report

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 20:39, 22 March 2020 (Alter: pages, doi. Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. Formatted dashes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by User:AManWithNoPlan | All pages linked from User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox2 | via #UCB_webform_linked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Report of the Committee on the Working of the Monetary System (commonly known as The Radcliffe Report) is a report published in 1959 about monetary policy and the workings of the Bank of England. It is named after its chairman, Cyril Radcliffe, 1st Viscount Radcliffe. The report started collecting evidence in 1957 and was the result of dissatisfaction with the workings of monetary policy in the 1950s.[1] It still today remains an important reference document on the Bank of England.

Context of creation

Monetary theory made progress after the interwar years but was disrupted by the war. After the second world war, the context was adequate to start rethinking how to run monetary policy and this is when the Radcliffe Committee was set up. The committee was composed of Lord Radcliffe, Professor Cairncross, Sir Oliver Franks, Viscount Harcourt, W. E. Jones, Professor Sayers, Sir Reginald Verdon Smith, George Woodcock and Sir John Woods.

Contents

The 339-pages report reviews British monetary policy since 1931 to give recommendations.[2] The report downplays the importance of keeping money supply within strict limits as well the importance of monetary policy. The report generally was a way to get more control over the Bank of England, suggesting for example to let the Chancellor of the Exchequer to announce changes in Bank rate instead of the Bank of England.[3]

Aftermath and impact

The clear impact of the report on monetary policy is debated and its actual influence on policy is limited. Economist Anna Schwartz, 10 years after the publication of the report, wrote that research in the following years gave "no support to the views expressed in the Radcliffe Report".[4]

References

  1. ^ Capie, Forrest (2010). The Bank of England: 1950s to 1979. Cambridge University Press. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-521-19282-8.
  2. ^ Katz, Samuel I. (3 November 1959). "Radcliffe Report: Monetary Policy and Debt Management Reconciled?" (PDF). Federal Reserve System.
  3. ^ "The Radcliffe Report, a short guide". National Institute Economic Review. 5 (1): 18–21. 1 September 1959. doi:10.1177/002795015900500103.
  4. ^ Schwartz, Anna J. (1987). "Why Money Matters". Money in Historical Perspective. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-74228-8. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)