Jump to content

Daniel Beer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs) at 05:42, 6 April 2020 (External links: add authority control). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Daniel Beer (born 1973) is Reader in Modern European history at Royal Holloway, University of London. His book, The House of the Dead, won the 2017 Cundill History Prize and was shortlisted for the Wolfson History Prize.[1][2][3][4]

Selected publications

  • Renovating Russia: the Human Sciences and the Fate of Liberal Modernity, 1880-1930. Cornell University Press, 2008.[5][6][7] ISBN 978-0801446276
  • The House of the Dead: Siberian Exile Under the Tsars. Allen Lane, 2016. ISBN 978-1846145377

References

  1. ^ "Dr Daniel Beer - Research - Royal Holloway, University of London". Pure.royalholloway.ac.uk. Retrieved 30 October 2017.
  2. ^ Rayfield, Donald (29 September 2016). "The House of the Dead by Daniel Beer review – was Siberia hell on earth?". Theguardian.com. Retrieved 30 October 2017.
  3. ^ "INTERVIEW: Daniel Beer, author of The House of the Dead: Siberian Exile Under the Tsars - Russian Art + Culture". Russianartandculture.com. 29 July 2016. Retrieved 30 October 2017.
  4. ^ "Daniel Beer". Penguin.co.uk. Retrieved 30 October 2017.
  5. ^ Beer, Daniel (12 June 2008). Renovating Russia: The Human Sciences and the Fate of Liberal Modernity, 1880–1930. Cornell University Press. ISBN 9780801446276. Retrieved 30 October 2017 – via Cornell University Press.
  6. ^ Nethercott, Frances (1 September 2012). "Renovating Russia: The Human Sciences and the Fate of Liberal Modernity,1880–1930. By Daniel Beer". Cultural and Social History. 9 (3): 469–470. doi:10.2752/147800412X13347542916783.
  7. ^ Mogilner, Marina (31 July 2010). "Renovating Russia: The Human Sciences and the Fate of Liberal Modernity, 1880-1930 (review)". Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 11 (3): 661–672. doi:10.1353/kri.0.0179.