Jump to content

Three-taxon analysis

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OAbot (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 14 April 2020 (Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Three-taxon analysis (or TTS, three-item analysis, 3ia) is a cladistic based method of phylogenetic reconstruction. Introduced by Nelson and Platnick (1991)[1] to reconstruct organisms' phylogeny, this method can also be applied to biogeographic areas. It attempts to reconstruct complex phylogenetic trees by breaking the problem down into simpler chunks. Rather than try to resolve the relationships of all X taxa at once, it considers taxa 3 at a time. It is relatively easy to generate three-taxon statements (3is); that is, statements of the form "A and B are more closely related to one another than to C".[2] Once each group of three taxa has been considered, the method constructs a tree that is consistent with as many three-item statements as possible.[2] Computer program that implement three-taxon analysis is LisBeth[3] (for systematic and biogeographic studies). LisBeth have been freely released.[4] A recent simulation-based study found that Three-taxon analysis yields good power and an error rate intermediate between parsimony with ordered states and parsimony with unordered states.[5]

Three-taxon analysis (3ia). Modified from Figure 1 from this paper:Grand A, Corvez A, Duque Velez LM, Laurin M. 2013.
Phylogenetic inference using discrete characters: performance of ordered and unordered parsimony and of three-item statements. Biol J Linn Soc. 110(4): 914–930.

See also

References

  1. ^ Nelson, G.; Platnick, N. I. (1991). "Three-Taxon Statements: A More Precise Use of Parsimony?". Cladistics. 7 (4): 351. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1991.tb00044.x.
  2. ^ a b Zaragueta-Bagils, R.; Bourdon, E. (2007). "Three-item analysis: Hierarchical representation and treatment of missing and inapplicable data". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 6 (6–7): 527. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2007.09.013.
  3. ^ Bagils, R. Z. E.; Ung, V.; Grand, A. S.; Vignes-Lebbe, R. G.; Cao, N. L.; Ducasse, J. (2012). "LisBeth: New cladistics for phylogenetics and biogeography". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 11 (8): 563. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2012.07.002.
  4. ^ "LisBeth package".
  5. ^ Grand, Anaïs; Corvez, Adèle; Duque Velez, Lina Maria; Laurin, Michel (2013). "Phylogenetic inference using discrete characters: Performance of ordered and unordered parsimony and of three-item statements". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 110 (4): 914–930. doi:10.1111/bij.12159.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three-taxon_analysis&oldid=950983297"