No-arbitrage bounds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) at 07:46, 2 May 2020 (Alter: template type. Add: doi, pages, volume, journal, bibcode, arxiv. Removed URL that duplicated unique identifier. Removed accessdate with no specified URL. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Activated by Headbomb | via #UCB_webform). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In financial mathematics, no-arbitrage bounds are mathematical relationships specifying limits on financial portfolio prices. These price bounds are a specific example of good-deal bounds, and are in fact the greatest extremes for good-deal bounds.[1]

The most frequent nontrivial example of no-arbitrage bounds is put-call parity for option prices. In incomplete markets, the bounds are given by the subhedging and superhedging prices.[1][2]

The essence of no-arbitrage in mathematical finance is excluding the possibility of "making money out of nothing" in the financial market. This is necessary because the existence of arbitrage is not only unrealistic, but also contradicts the possibility of an economic equilibrium. All mathematical models of financial markets have to satisfy a no-arbitrage condition to be realistic models.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b John R. Birge (2008). Financial Engineering. Elsevier. pp. 521–524. ISBN 978-0-444-51781-4.
  2. ^ Arai, Takuji; Fukasawa, Masaaki (2011). "Convex risk measures for good deal bounds". arXiv:1108.1273v1. Bibcode:2011arXiv1108.1273A. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ Fontana, Claudio (May 13, 2014). "Weak and strong no-arbitrage conditions for continuous financial markets". International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance. 18: 1550005. arXiv:1302.7192. doi:10.1142/S0219024915500053.