Jump to content

William Hannibal Thomas

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Monkbot (talk | contribs) at 18:37, 19 December 2020 (Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 6 templates: del empty params (5×); del |ref=harv (1×);). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

William Hannibal Thomas
BornMay 4, 1843
Pickaway County, Ohio
DiedNovember 15, 1935
Columbus, Ohio
EducationOtterbein University
Western Theological Seminary
Occupation(s)Teacher, journalist, judge, writer, legislator

William Hannibal Thomas (4 May 1843 – 15 November 1935) was an American teacher, journalist, judge, writer and legislator. He battled racism throughout his life, first notably during the riots at Otterbein University, which was a major force leading to his withdrawal. In 1861, he was rejected entry from the union's army until 1863 when he served and contracted a gunshot wound, leading to the amputation of his right arm. He published "Land and Education," in 1890, promoting avenues for Black people to obtain land and largely criticizing white people for troubles brought onto Black people. He garnered heavy attention from the Black community when he published his most famous work, The American Negro, which took a large conceptual leap from his earlier work, shifting failures of the Black community onto themselves.[1]

Biography

Early life

William Hannibal Thomas was born in Pickaway County, Ohio. His family had been formerly enslaved, although Thomas insisted that "most of his ancestors were white."[2] In 1859, he was the first black student admitted to Otterbein University.

He served with distinction in the 5th United States Colored Infantry Regiment during the Civil War of 1861-1865, suffering a gunshot wound that led to the amputation of his right arm.[3] After the war, he attended Western Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania.

Career

Thomas wrote correspondence for the A.M.E. Church’s national newspaper the Christian Recorder from 1865-1870 and published 28 articles during that time. He provided and discussed his opinions on black life and issues, as well as religion, political commentary, and other topics. [4]

In 1871, he taught for some time and then he earned a license to practice law in South Carolina in 1873.[2] He worked briefly at Wilberforce University in Ohio. He then served as a member of the South Carolina Legislature during the Reconstruction period. During Reconstruction, he was an open advocate for armed Black self-defense against white supremacist violence.[4]

In 1878, President Rutherford B. Hayes appointed Thomas U.S. consul to Portuguese Southwest Africa (now Angola).[5] Later he founded his own journal, The Negro.

He is now most remembered for The American Negro (1901),[4] a bombastic work brought out by the Macmillan publishing company. In this book, he wrote that it was not skin color but the black population's traits of character and behavior were the cause of prejudice. "The negro", he wrote, was "an intrinsically inferior type of humanity."[6] He declared that the black individual in America was slowly and steadily deteriorating, and was "immersed in poverty, steeped in ignorance, stifled with immorality, inherently lazy, and a born pilferer."[7] His writings were used by white racists to support their own ideas of "white superiority and black inferiority."[2]

Several black intellectuals such as Booker T. Washington,[8] W.E.B. Du Bois[9] and Charles W. Chesnutt,[10][11] attacked the author and sought to suppress his book.[12]

Death

He died in Columbus, Ohio in 1935.

Bibliography

  • Land and Education: A Critical and Practical Discussion of the Mental and Physical Needs of the Freedmen. (1890)
    Land and Education is a pamphlet published in 1890 which discusses the issue of black land ownership in the South. In it, Thomas laments the state Black prosperity and suggests Black people pursue industrial education and land ownership. Thomas says this should be done mostly through hard work and effort on the part of Black people, though he also suggests that some aid come from the national government and philanthropy from the Northerners. [13]
  • The American Negro: What He Was, What He Is, and What He May Become: A Critical and Practical Discussion. (1901)[14]The American Negro is a book published in 1901 which discusses Thomas’ views of Black people and what ought to be done by Black people to uplift them. Among other things, Thomas recommends assimilating as much as possible with white society. He believes that this will help Black people profit in an economic sense as well as a spiritual one. Thomas encourages a Christianity which resembles white worship and discourages worship practices typical of Black communities. The American Negro contains white supremacist messaging and a general distaste for the Black community, especially that of the south, which caused backlash from Thomas’ contemporaries. [7]

Critics

Booker T. Washington

In response to Thomas's book, The American Negro, Booker T. Washington criticized Thomas in his characterization of Black people and the evidence he provided. Washington started with the assertion that Thomas identifies himself as part of the negro but writes as if he were not apart. Washington rebuts Thomas's claim that Black people have been largely unsuccessful when it came to land ownership with statistics from Virginia and Georgia which showed rise in land ownership from Black people, and that Thomas would have the race rely too heavily on the government to distribute land at the jeopardy of the Black individual's independence. According to Washington, "The author of this book condemns practically every method that has been used for lifting up the negro; everything is wrong except that which he advocates, but which he himself, it seems, has failed to put into practice anywhere in the South. He advocates industrial education all through his book, yet condemns it as it now exists in many negro schools at the South."[15] Washington continued to point out what he believed to be contradictions in Thomas's argument, such as the claim that the negro code did not allow for games involving chance yet later in the argument made claims that a severe character flaw of Black people was their indulgence of gambling.[15] Another contradicting claim Washington pointed out was Thomas's assertion that the low birth rates and high death rates would keep Black people from ever making up a large proportion of the population, but in another argument claims that the negro population is growing by the millions. To Washington, the type of evidence Thomas collected was purely anecdotal and lacked any way to confirm such claims like a name, place, or date. Ultimately, Washington described his and the Black Community's lack of respect for Thomas to come from Thomas's lack of effort to reach out to Black people in the south, and speak to them himself.

W.E.B. DU Bois

W.E.B. Du Bois largely criticized the tone and characterizations Thomas made in his 1901 book The American Negro, finding most of the evidence dubious at best. Du Bois took interest in Thomas's tone finding the tone of the book to be despairing, describing, "its cynical pessimism, virulent criticisms, vulgar plainness, and glaring self-contradictions."[16] Du Bois claimed that the pressures and stresses of Black life had an effect on Thomas, one that, "tends to develop the criminal or the hypocrite, the cynic or the radical."[16] To Du Bois, Thomas falls in the category of the cynic, and for all that is hopeful in The American Negro, Thomas gives way to despair. Thomas is described as a man that went South during reconstruction to teach the negro everything he needed to know but in a rapid amount of time. He failed and left with his shattered ideal of what the negro was. Du Bois pointed out the editions of Thomas's book, how it started as a pamphlet in 1890, not receiving much attention, before being rewritten into his book in 1901. Despite being rewritten many of the ideas and writing is reused, which Du Bois attributed to what caused the contradictions, as the old ideas written ten years prior are incompatible with Thomas reformed opinions. Some of these differences from the 1901 pamphlet included a reversal of criticism, instead of defending the negro Thomas severely criticized them, and removed much of the blame he attributed to white people in the original pamphlet. Largely Du Bois found the book to be contradictory thematcially because the original pamphlet was written with hope, and still had some of those themes left over in the book, but side aside newer themes of scathing critique. While Du Bois accepted that a man can change his opinion in the course of ten years, over the ten years from the pamphlet to the book, Thomas removed himself from the Black community in the south, therefore to Du Bois, the original opinion from the pamphlet held more weight. [16]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Smith, John David. "William Hannibal Thomas (1843-1935)". Retrieved 2020-11-24.
  2. ^ a b c Rabaka, Reiland (2012). Hip Hop's Amnesia: From Blues and the Black Women's Club Movement to Rap and the Hip Hop Movement. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Book. pp. 45–46. ISBN 9780739174920.
  3. ^ Smith, John David (2004). "William Hannibal Thomas, b. 1843," Documenting the American South.
  4. ^ a b c Smith, John David (2000). Black Judas: William Hannibal Thomas and "The American Negro". Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  5. ^ Smith, John David (2003). "Thomas, William Hannibal." In: Historical Dictionary of the Gilded Age. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, p. 492.
  6. ^ The American Negro. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1901, p. 238.
  7. ^ a b The American Negro (1901), p. 384.
  8. ^ Washington, Booker T. (1901). "The American Negro," The Outlook, Vol. 67, pp. 733–736.
  9. ^ DuBois, W.E.B. (1901). "The Sorm and Stress in the Black World," The Dial, Vol. 30, pp. 262–264.
  10. ^ Chesnutt, Charles W. (1901). "A Difamer of his Race," The Critic, Vol. 38, pp. 350–351.
  11. ^ Thomas, William Hannibal (1901). "Mr. William Hannibal Thomas Defends his Book," The Critic, Vol. 38, pp. 548–550.
  12. ^ Smith (2000), p. 212.
  13. ^ Our Day: A Record and Review of Current Reform. Our Day Publishing Company. 1890.
  14. ^ "More About the American Negro," The Book Buyer, Vol. 22, 1901, pp. 143–144.
  15. ^ a b Washington, Booker (1901). "The American Negro". The Outlook. 67: 733–736 – via SCRIBD.
  16. ^ a b c Du Bois, W.E.B. (1901). "The Storm and Stress in the Black World". The Dial. 30: 262–264.

Further reading

  • Bracey, Earnest N. (2005). "Analysis of a Racial Parasite: Black Judas: William Hannibal Thomas and the American Negro." In: Places in Political Time: Voices from the Black Diaspora. University Press of America, pp. 40–49.
  • Councill, W.H. (1902). "The American Negro: An Answer," Publications of the Southern History Association, Vol. 6, pp. 40–44.
  • Luker, Ralph E. (1998). "Theologies of Race Relations." In: The Social Gospel in Black and White: American Racial Reform, 1885-1912. University of North Carolina Press, pp. 268–311.
  • McElrath, Joseph, ed. (1997). To Be an Author: Letters of Charles Chesnutt, 1889-1905. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Smith, John David (2003). "The Lawyer vs. the Race Traitor: Charles W. Chesnutt, William Hannibal Thomas, and The American Negro," Journal of The Historical Society, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 225–248.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Hannibal_Thomas&oldid=995188714"