This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 73.9.33.62(talk) at 01:10, 10 January 2021(Grammer edit "can also be views" -> "can also be viewed"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:10, 10 January 2021 by 73.9.33.62(talk)(Grammer edit "can also be views" -> "can also be viewed")
where is a binomial coefficient; one interpretation of which is the coefficient of the xk term in the expansion of (1 + x)n. There is no restriction on the relative sizes of n and k,[1] since, if n < k the value of the binomial coefficient is zero and the identity remains valid.
Pascal's rule can also be viewed as a statement that the formula
solves the linear two-dimensional difference equation
over the natural numbers. Thus, Pascal's rule is also a
statement about a formula for the numbers appearing in Pascal's triangle.
Pascal's rule has an intuitive combinatorial meaning, that is clearly expressed in this counting proof.[2]
Proof. Recall that equals the number of subsets with k elements from a set with n elements. Suppose one particular element is uniquely labeled X in a set with n elements.
To construct a subset of k elements containing X, choose X and k − 1 elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are such subsets.
To construct a subset of k elements not containing X, choose k elements from the remaining n − 1 elements in the set. There are such subsets.
Every subset of k elements either contains X or not. The total number of subsets with k elements in a set of n elements is the sum of the number of subsets containing X and the number of subsets that do not contain X, .
This equals ; therefore, .
Algebraic proof
Alternatively, the algebraic derivation of the binomial case follows.
Generalization
Pascal's rule can be generalized to multinomial coefficients.[3] For any integerp such that , and ,
where is the coefficient of the term in the expansion of .
The algebraic derivation for this general case is as follows.[3] Let p be an integer such that , and . Then