Airey v Ireland
Mrs. Airey wished to obtain a decree of judicial separation from her husband (divorce was illegal in Ireland); at that time legal aid was not available in Ireland for any civil matters, including seeking a judicial separation.
The Court held that:
- there has been a breach of Article 6 para. 1 (fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights, by 5 votes to 2;
- there has been a breach of Article 8 (private and family life), by 4 votes to 3;
- it was not necessary also to examine the case under Article 14 (non-discrimination) taken in conjunction with Article 6 para. 1, by 4 votes to 3;
- it was not necessary also to examine the case under Article 13 (effective remedy), by 4 votes to 3.
Judges Thór Vilhjálmsson, O'Donoghue and Evrigenis each filed a dissent.
In the case, it was established that the right of effective access to the courts may entail legal assistance. Airey case has been applied in a number of cases on civil legal aid.
- ECHR judgment in case Airey v. Ireland, para. 8-11
- Harris D. J., O'Boyle M., Warbrick C. Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Second edition. p. 236 New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. ISBN 978-0-406-90594-9
|This article relating to law in Ireland is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|