Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.
 | This article is missing information about Error: you must specify what information is missing.. (December 2014) |
Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83 (2000), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that defined the California standard for unconscionability. The court required that there be both a procedural and substantive element of unconscionability for a contract to be voided.[1]
References
- ^ Ayres, I. & Speidel , R.E. Studies in Contract Law, Seventh Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2008, p. 584
 | This article relating to case law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |