Baron Silkin
Baron Silkin, of Dulwich in the County of London, is a title in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.[1] It was created in 1950 for the solicitor and Labour politician Lewis Silkin.[citation needed] The peerage was disclaimed by both his eldest son, the second Baron, and the latter's nephew, the third Baron.[citation needed] When the third Baron disclaimed the title in 2002, the barony of Silkin became the first peerage ever to be disclaimed twice; and the only disclaim since the House of Lords Act 1999[citation needed] (which excluded hereditary peers from automatically sitting in the House of Lords and thereby made such peers eligible to sit in the Commons, the main purpose for the 1963 Act.)
Samuel Silkin, Baron Silkin of Dulwich and John Silkin, younger sons of the first Baron, were also prominent Labour politicians. Lord Silkin of Dulwich was the father of Christopher Silkin, disclaimed third Baron Silkin.
Barons Silkin (1950)
- Lewis Silkin, 1st Baron Silkin (1889–1972)
- Arthur Silkin, 2nd Baron Silkin (1916–2001) (disclaimed 1972)
- Christopher Lewis Silkin, 3rd Baron Silkin (b. 1947) (disclaimed 2002)[2]
The heir presumptive is the present holder's first cousin Rory Lewis Silkin (b. 1954)[3]
Notes
- ^ Baron Silkin Archived September 28, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Cracroft's Peerage, UK.
- ^ "House of Lords Journal 235 (Session 2001–02)". 16 May 2002. p. 724. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 16 June 2008.
The Lord Chancellor informed the House that he had received from Christopher Lewis Baron Silkin an instrument of disclaimer of the Barony of Silkin delivered in accordance with section 1 of the Peerage Act 1963.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ Cracroft's Peerage Archived September 28, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
References
- Kidd, Charles, Williamson, David (editors). Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage (1990 edition). New York: St Martin's Press, 1990, [page needed]
- Leigh Rayment's Peerage Pages [self-published source] [better source needed]