Jump to content

Bornhuetter–Ferguson method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jchmrt (talk | contribs) at 10:30, 29 August 2017 (Reverted 1 edit by 86.98.43.92 identified as test/vandalism using STiki). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method is a prominent[1][2][3][4][5][6] loss reserving technique.

Background

The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method was introduced in the 1972 paper "The Actuary and IBNR," co-authored by Ron Bornhuetter and Ron Ferguson.[4][5][7][8]

Like other loss reserving techniques, the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method aims to estimate incurred but not reported insurance claim amounts. It is primarily used in the property and casualty[5][9] and health insurance[2] fields.

Generally considered a blend of the chain-ladder and expected claims loss reserving methods,[2][8][10] the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method uses both reported or paid losses as well as an a priori expected loss ratio to arrive at an ultimate loss estimate.[2][9] Simply, reported (or paid) losses are added to a priori expected losses multiplied by an estimated percent unreported. The estimated percent unreported (or unpaid) is established by observing historical claims experience.[2]

The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method can be used with either reported or paid losses.[2][5]

Methodology

There are two algebraically equivalent approaches to calculating the Bornhuetter-Ferguson ultimate loss.

In the first approach, undeveloped reported (or paid) losses are added directly to expected losses (based on an a priori loss ratio) multiplied by an estimated percent unreported.

[2][5][10]

In the second approach, reported (or paid) losses are first developed to ultimate using a chain-ladder approach and applying a loss development factor (LDF). Next, the chain-ladder ultimate is multiplied by an estimated percent reported. Finally, expected losses multiplied by an estimated percent unreported are added (as in the first approach).

[2][5]

The estimated percent reported is the reciprocal of the loss development factor.[2][5]

Incurred but not reported claims can then be determined by subtracting reported losses from the Bornhuetter-Ferguson ultimate loss estimate.

See also

References

  1. ^ https://www.scor.com/en/sgrc/risk-management/reserving/item/2099-measuring-the-variability-of-chain-ladder-reserve-estimates.html?lout=sgrc
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-27. Retrieved 2016-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. ^ http://us.milliman.com/uploadedFiles/insight/pc-published/pdfs/fresh-look-at-actuarial.pdf
  4. ^ a b http://www.variancejournal.org/issues/02-01/85.pdf
  5. ^ a b c d e f g https://www.casact.org/library/studynotes/Friedland_estimating.pdf
  6. ^ http://www.casact.org/members/index.cfm?fa=viewArticle&articleID=709
  7. ^ https://www.casact.org/pubs/proceed/proceed72/72181.pdf
  8. ^ a b http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bornhuetterferguson-technique.asp
  9. ^ a b https://www.casact.org/library/studynotes/Werner_Modlin_Ratemaking.pdf
  10. ^ a b http://www.variancejournal.org/issues/01-02/292.pdf