Casey's theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, Casey's theorem, also known as the generalized Ptolemy's theorem, is a theorem in Euclidean geometry named after the Irish mathematician John Casey.

Formulation of the theorem[edit]

t_{12} \cdot t_{34}+t_{41}\cdot t_{23}-t_{13}\cdot t_{24}=0

Let \,O be a circle of radius \,R. Let \,O_1, O_2, O_3, O_4 be (in that order) four non-intersecting circles that lie inside \,O and tangent to it. Denote by \,t_{ij} the length of the exterior common bitangent of the circles \,O_i, O_j. Then:[1]

\,t_{12} \cdot t_{34}+t_{41} \cdot t_{23}=t_{13}\cdot t_{24}.

Note that in the degenerate case, where all four circles reduce to points, this is exactly Ptolemy's theorem.

Proof[edit]

The following proof is due[2] to Zacharias.[3] Denote the radius of circle \,O_i by \,R_i and its tangency point with the circle \,O by \,K_i. We will use the notation \,O, O_i for the centers of the circles. Note that from Pythagorean theorem,

\,t_{ij}^2=\overline{O_iO_j}^2-(R_i-R_j)^2.

We will try to express this length in terms of the points \,K_i,K_j. By the law of cosines in triangle \,O_iOO_j,

\overline{O_iO_j}^2=\overline{OO_i}^2+\overline{OO_j}^2-2\overline{OO_i}\cdot \overline{OO_j}\cdot \cos\angle O_iOO_j

Since the circles \,O,O_i tangent to each other:

\overline{OO_i} = R - R_i,\, \angle O_iOO_j = \angle K_iOK_j

Let \,C be a point on the circle \,O. According to the law of sines in triangle \,K_iCK_j:

\overline{K_iK_j} = 2R\cdot \sin\angle K_iCK_j = 2R\cdot \sin\frac{\angle K_iOK_j}{2}

Therefore,

\cos\angle K_iOK_j = 1-2\sin^2\frac{\angle K_iOK_j}{2}=1-2\cdot \left(\frac{\overline{K_iK_j}}{2R}\right)^2 = 1 - \frac{\overline{K_iK_j}^2}{2R^2}

and substituting these in the formula above:

\overline{O_iO_j}^2=(R-R_i)^2+(R-R_j)^2-2(R-R_i)(R-R_j)\left(1-\frac{\overline{K_iK_j}^2}{2R^2}\right)
\overline{O_iO_j}^2=(R-R_i)^2+(R-R_j)^2-2(R-R_i)(R-R_j)+(R-R_i)(R-R_j)\cdot \frac{\overline{K_iK_j}^2}{R^2}
\overline{O_iO_j}^2=((R-R_i)-(R-R_j))^2+(R-R_i)(R-R_j)\cdot \frac{\overline{K_iK_j}^2}{R^2}

And finally, the length we seek is

t_{ij}=\sqrt{\overline{O_iO_j}^2-(R_i-R_j)^2}=\frac{\sqrt{R-R_i}\cdot \sqrt{R-R_j}\cdot \overline{K_iK_j}}{R}

We can now evaluate the left hand side, with the help of the original Ptolemy's theorem applied to the inscribed quadrilateral \,K_1K_2K_3K_4:

t_{12}t_{34}+t_{14}t_{23}=\frac{1}{R^2}\cdot \sqrt{R-R_1}\sqrt{R-R_2}\sqrt{R-R_3}\sqrt{R-R_4}\left(\overline{K_1K_2}\cdot \overline{K_3K_4}+\overline{K_1K_4}\cdot \overline{K_2K_3}\right)
=\frac{1}{R^2}\cdot \sqrt{R-R_1}\sqrt{R-R_2}\sqrt{R-R_3}\sqrt{R-R_4}\left(\overline{K_1K_3}\cdot \overline{K_2K_4}\right)=t_{13}t_{24}

Q.E.D.

Further generalizations[edit]

It can be seen that the four circles need not lie inside the big circle. In fact, they may be tangent to it from the outside as well. In that case, the following change should be made:[4]

If \,O_i, O_j are both tangent from the same side of \,O (both in or both out), \,t_{ij} is the length of the exterior common tangent.

If \,O_i, O_j are tangent from different sides of \,O (one in and one out), \,t_{ij} is the length of the interior common tangent.

The converse of Casey's theorem is also true.[4] That is, if equality holds, the circles are tangent.

Applications[edit]

Casey's theorem and its converse can be used to prove a variety of statements in Euclidean geometry. For example, the shortest known proof[1]:411 of Feuerbach's theorem uses the converse theorem.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Casey, J. (1866). "On the Equations and Properties: (1) of the System of Circles Touching Three Circles in a Plane; (2) of the System of Spheres Touching Four Spheres in Space; (3) of the System of Circles Touching Three Circles on a Sphere; (4) of the System of Conics Inscribed to a Conic, and Touching Three Inscribed Conics in a Plane". Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 9: 396–423. JSTOR 20488927. 
  2. ^ Bottema, O. (1944). Hoofdstukken uit de Elementaire Meetkunde. (translation by Reinie Erné as Topics in Elementary Geometry, Springer 2008, of the second extended edition published by Epsilon-Uitgaven 1987). 
  3. ^ Zacharias, M. (1942). Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 52.  Missing or empty |title= (help)
  4. ^ a b Johnson, Roger A. (1929). Modern Geometry. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (republished facsimile by Dover 1960, 2007 as Advanced Euclidean Geometry). 

External links[edit]