Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued April 19, 2004
Decided June 7, 2004
Full case name Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Petitioner v. Thomas E. Heinz, et al.
Citations 541 U.S. 739 (more)
ERISA §204(g) prohibits a plan amendment expanding the categories of postretirement employment that triggers suspension of the payment of early retirement benefits already accrued.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
Majority Souter, joined by unanimous court
Concurrence Breyer, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Ginsburg

Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz, 541 U.S. 739 (2004), is a case that was argued in the Supreme Court of the United States on 19 April 2004. The question it presented was whether Section 204(g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act contradicts Section 203(a)(3)(B).

See also[edit]

Further reading[edit]

  • Clarkson, Michael; Thomas, Ann (2004). "Recent Developments in Employer-Employee Relations". Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal. 40: 369. ISSN 1543-3234. 
  • Ryan, Priscilla E.; Sharara, Norma M. (2004). "Employee Benefits". Tax Lawyer. 58: 1055. ISSN 0040-005X. 

External links[edit]