Jump to content

Cochrane v. Deener

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 19:40, 6 June 2016 (Substing templates: {{scite}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cochrane v. Deener
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 19, 1877
Full case nameCochrane v. Deener
Citations94 U.S. 780 (more)
24 L. Ed. 139; 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1942; 4 Otto 780
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Nathan Clifford · Noah H. Swayne
Samuel F. Miller · Stephen J. Field
William Strong · Joseph P. Bradley
Ward Hunt
Case opinions
MajorityBradley, joined by Waite, Swayne, Miller, Davis, Field, Hunt
DissentClifford, joined by Strong

Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U.S. 780 (1876), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a process transforming grain meal into purified flour was patentable.[1]

References

  1. ^ Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U.S. 780, 785-88 (1876)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cochrane_v._Deener&oldid=724039818"