Dalabon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Dangbon)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Dalabon or Dangbon are an indigenous Australian people of the Northern Territory.

Name[edit]

Traditionally the people now called Dalabon had no collective name for themselves, and the term itself derives from the language which members of the community speak.[1]

Language[edit]

The Dalabon language is classified among the far East Arnhem Land language group,[2] and as belonging to the Gunwinyguan language family.[3] It is under severe threat of extinction.[4] One feature of its linguistic culture, the relative absence of nouns for emotions, combined with its rich repertoire (160 lexemes) of emotional verbs and adjectives[5] has recently attracted the attention of scholars

Country[edit]

By the time of the advent of colonialism, the Dalabon's tribal territory is thought to have covered some 2,000 square miles (5,200 km2),[6] in south-western Arnhem Land.[3] Norman Tindale placed their northern boundary at the upper Goyder River, and their heartland around the headwaters of the Phelp, Rose and Hart rivers.[6] Maïa Ponsonnet states that before the colonial period they were located in Central Arnhem Land with clan estates extending further north in the direction of the Arafura Sea.[3] Their immediate tribal environment consisted of several peoples: the Jawoyn to their southwest, Kune and Mayali speakers of the Bininj Gun-Wok dialect chain on their west-north western boundaries, the Ngalakgan on their southern frontier and the Rembarrnga beyond their eastern limits.[7]

Lifestyle[edit]

The Dalabon were semi-nomadic hunter gatherers, with access to abundant food resources culled throughout a mixed savannah and forest area which experienced three seasonal changes: a humid wet monsoonal period from December to April, followed by three cool dry months (May to July), and closing with the gradual onset of warming from August to November as a prelude to the return of the rainy summer season.[8]

Social organization[edit]

Dalabon society had 8 subsections, each of which had a male and female name, and which can be analysed in terms of three dichotomies. The first taxonomy identifies people in terms of patrimoieties of the Dua/Yirritja[a] type. A second division of descent is matrilineal; the intersection of these two forms 4 sections. A third system has subsections to elicit the ideal father-and-son pairs.[9]

The structure of these moieties and semi-moieties affects the ritual choreography of two major ceremonies, Gunabibi and Yabuduruwa, held on alternating years by the Dalabon and some contiguous tribes.[10]

Mythology[edit]

In the earliest times, according to Dalabon cosmology, men passed the night-time under water, and had stumps for legs. The crocodile was master of the secret of fire. This changed when the kingfisher managed to filch a firebrand from the crocodile, and set fire to the landscape, and men were burnt, leading them to learn the art of cooking and also acquire the legs they now have. Two pairs of immemorial, ancestral people (Nayunghyungkig), the Yirritja men Bulanj and Kodjok, and the Duwa women Kalidjan and Kamanj, -collectively referred to as the Nakoorkko - wandered the earth, laying down the law (walu-no) inscribed in the nature of the Dalabon landscape and its reflex in Dalabon social customs.[11]

Modern times[edit]

The Dalabon today mainly live in an area east of Katherine, in Beswick (Wugularr)), Barunga (Bamyili), Bulman and Weemol.[3]

Customs[edit]

Kenneth Maddock found the Dalabon still preserved a custom, which they called magard, which had been briefly noted earlier among the Yolgnu and the Burarra, and called Mirriri, according to which a man whose classificatory sister had been subject to obscene abuse[b] implying she was engaged in sexual improprieties, was obliged to assault her, armed with a spear, boomerang or sticks.[13] W. Lloyd Warner took the practice as a ritual expression of displeasure performed to allay the outbreak of hostilities between the respective clans of husband and wife; Lester Hiatt thought his material suggested rather a brother's disavowal of incestuous interest in his sister; Maddock took the Dalabon custom as a predictable ceremonial affirmation of a social relation forming part of a larger body of tribal etiquette.[c]

Ethnographic studies[edit]

Kenneth Maddock did the first comprehensive studies of the Dalabon.[8]

Alternative names[edit]

  • Buan, Bu:wan, Boun.[15]
  • Ngalkbon.[6]

Tindale's Dangbon[edit]

Norman Tindale posited the existence of a 'tribe', the Dangbon whom he considered distinct from the Dalabon, but was unable to furnish an estimate for their tribal lands, other than locating these Dangbon to the east of the Liverpool River's headwaters and at those of the Cadell and Mann rivers.[6]. He also provided a list of alternative names for this group

  • Gundangbon
  • Dangbun
  • Dangbar. (typo)
  • Gumauwurk[6]

Contemporary scholarship now regards Dangbon as an alternative name for the Dalabon.[16]

Some words[edit]

Nicholas Evans notes that the Dalabon rootmen, with more or less the general sense of 'social conscience /awareness', emerges in an adjectival compound form like men-djabalarrk (obedient) that is applied also to non-human beings like a dog.[17]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Ponsonnet transcribes the Dalabon form of these names, common in the area (see Yolgnu) as Duwa/Yirridjdja[9]
  2. ^ Evans, arguing that √beng covers more or less the idea of 'mind' in English, though perhaps etymologically related to a word for 'ear', writes:'The propound √beng, .. hardly ever occurs outside verbal formations. The main use of this word as a free form is with the specialized meaning ('(taboo on)(a man) swearing at, concerning or in presence of sister.'[12]
  3. ^ Burbank studied the same practice among the Nunggubuyu.[14]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Maddock 1989, p. 82.
  2. ^ Dixon 2002, p. xl.
  3. ^ a b c d Ponsonnet 2014, p. 28.
  4. ^ Ponsonnet 2014, p. 1.
  5. ^ Ponsonnet 2014, pp. 2,18.
  6. ^ a b c d e Tindale 1974, p. 222.
  7. ^ Ponsonnet 2014, pp. 28–29.
  8. ^ a b Ponsonnet 2014, p. 30.
  9. ^ a b Ponsonnet 2014, p. 34.
  10. ^ Maddock 1989, pp. 83–84.
  11. ^ Ponsonnet 2014, pp. 36–37.
  12. ^ Evans 2007, pp. 72,76.
  13. ^ Maddock 1970, pp. 165–176,165,167.
  14. ^ Burbank 1985, p. 47.
  15. ^ Maddock 1970, p. 165.
  16. ^ Garde 2013, p. 14.
  17. ^ Evans 2007, pp. 71–71.

Sources[edit]