Jump to content

Dismorphia amphione

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ArmbrustBot (talk | contribs) at 14:40, 13 December 2014 (→‎References: upmerge category per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 November 11, and possible general fixes using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Dismorphia amphione
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Species:
D. amphione
Binomial name
Dismorphia amphione
(Cramer, [1779])[1]
Synonyms
  • Papilio amphione Cramer, [1779]
  • Papilio amphiona Cramer, [1779]
  • Papilio astynome Dalman, 1823
  • Dismorphia polymela Geyer, 1832
  • Dismorphia astynome paulistana Fruhstorfer, 1912
  • Dismorphia astynome cellularis Martin, [1923]
  • Dismorphia astynome chloronome Avinoff, 1926
  • Leptalis praxinoe Doubleday, 1844
  • Leptalis amphithea C. & R. Felder, [1865]
  • Dismorphia arsinoides Staudinger, 1884
  • Leptalis arsinoe C. & R. Felder, 1865
  • Dismorphia discrepans Butler, 1896
  • Dismorphia rhomboidea Butler, 1896
  • Dismorphia broomeae Butler, 1899
  • Dismorphia amphione astynomides Röber, 1909
  • Dismorphia robinsoni Schaus, 1929

The Tiger Mimic White (Dismorphia amphione) is a species of butterfly of the Pieridae family. It is found from Mexico and the Caribbean down to Brazil and Bolivia.

The wingspan is about 77 mm. It is an extremely variable species.[2]

The larvae feed on Inga species, including Inga sapindoides and Inga densiflora.

Dismorphia amphione mimics the ithomiine Mechanitis lysimnia Fabricius in colour pattern and in the slow regular flight.[3]

Subspecies

  • Dismorphia amphione amphione (Surinam)
  • Dismorphia amphione astynome (Dalman, 1823) (Brazil (São Paulo, Bahia, Minas Gerais), Argentina)
  • Dismorphia amphione praxinoe (Doubleday, 1844) (Mexico, from Panama to Colombia)
  • Dismorphia amphione beroe (Lucas, 1852) (Colombia)
  • Dismorphia amphione egaena (Bates, 1861) (Brazil (Amazonas))
  • Dismorphia amphione discrepans Butler, 1896 (Ecuador)
  • Dismorphia amphione rhomboidea Butler, 1896 (Ecuador, Peru)
  • Dismorphia amphione broomeae Butler, 1899 (Venezuela, Trinidad)
  • Dismorphia amphione meridionalis Röber, 1909 (Bolivia)
  • Dismorphia amphione daguana Bargmann, 1929 (Colombia)
  • Dismorphia amphione lupita Lamas, 1979 (Mexico)
  • Dismorphia amphione isolda Llorente, 1984 (Mexico)
  • Dismorphia amphione bertha Lamas, 2004 (Peru)
  • Dismorphia amphione mora Lamas, 2004 (Peru)

References

  1. ^ Dismorphia at funet
  2. ^ Butterflies of the Sangay National Park
  3. ^ *Kassarov, L. 2001 (2004). Is aposematism a valid concept in predator-prey relationships between birds and butterflies? A different point of view. Tropical Lepidoptera 12(1-2): 1-15. pdf Abstract: The concept of aposematism, especially in regard to butterflies, is discussed in terms of the close interrelationship between butterflies, as prey, and birds, as their predators, in their common environment. Vision, in a broad sense, and especially in terms of the visual capabilities of the avian eye, is discussed as a basis for understanding the difference between the aerial hawker insectivorous bird predators of butterflies, and all other birds, regardless of whether considered primarily insectivorous or not. The marked differences in foraging behavior determine how a bird perceives the bright color patterns of butterflies. For aposematic color patterns to be effective, they have to be seen by the bird as an optical device advertising distasteful or toxic qualities of the potential prey so that the predator avoids them by sight. It is argued here that birds that prey on butterflies do not perceive them as an aposematic insect, as postulated by the concept of aposematism. The bird does not reject a butterfly on the basis of color pattern, but on the basis of characteristic morphological and behavioral patterns which provide the bird with a signal as to whether the butterfly is energetically profitable or unprofitable for the bird as a food source.