Jump to content

File:1789 Libels Freeman Andrews Boston.png

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1789_Libels_Freeman_Andrews_Boston.png (280 × 475 pixels, file size: 77 KB, MIME type: image/png)

Description

From: "Candid considerations on libels. In which are represented, I. Their influence on the publick mind. II. The necessity of refuting them, III. The inexpediency of the law against them. IV. The insuffiency of obtaining redress thereby, and the consequent propriety of appealing to the publick. With some observations on the liberty of the press. By a friend to harmony."

Boston: printed by E. Freeman and L. Andrews
Date
Source Early American Imprints, Series 1, no. 21725
Author Author unknown
Public domain
Public domain
This media file is in the public domain in the United States. This applies to U.S. works where the copyright has expired, often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1929, and if not then due to lack of notice or renewal. See this page for further explanation.

United States
United States
This image might not be in the public domain outside of the United States; this especially applies in the countries and areas that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works, such as Canada, Mainland China (not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany, Mexico, and Switzerland. The creator and year of publication are essential information and must be provided. See Wikipedia:Public domain and Wikipedia:Copyrights for more details.

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Items portrayed in this file

depicts

image/png

d16af766d632c37e7e3c0fceee0a42a01204e02f

78,373 byte

475 pixel

280 pixel

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current12:51, 15 July 2010Thumbnail for version as of 12:51, 15 July 2010280 × 475 (77 KB)M2545{{Information |Description=From: "Candid considerations on libels. In which are represented, I. Their influence on the publick mind. II. The necessity of refuting them, III. The inexpediency of the law against them. IV. The insuffiency of obtaining redres

The following page uses this file: