File talk:Curzon line en.svg
What am incredible tingent of slighted information!
Where is the perfect fascet though?
I gave up looking for my old base deseign once I realized there is more than likely, more grey area that has gone uncharted [“(here)”].
I hate you always, Sara Katherine Sexton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:C809:4100:3421:4C0E:6E59:BAC9 (talk) 09:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Curzon Line
[edit]
The line marked as Curzon line isn't original line proposed by Lord Curzon after WWI.
It's a factoid made after boundary change decision was made to anchor decision in a geopolitical context with allegedly ethnographic rationale.
The original Curzon line was limited to former Galicia and intended to delimit areas controlled by Polish and West Ukrainian forces in an interim period.
Moreover the Curzon line had 2 variants A and B.
I suggest to differentiate in color southern part of the line with label "Curzon Line A". The rest could be labelled as you wish for example "Yalta line".
Or alternatively get rid of the line at all.
Marqoz (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
polish aggression
[edit]
why everywhere you forgot to mention that whole east and north parts of poland before 1939 were annexed from ethnic Lithuanians-Belarus-Prussians and Ukrainians by polish occupants ?????? ethnic poland begins below the river Vistula and to the east of the rive Varta
