File talk:IndoEuropeanTree.svg

Greenlandic only has about 50.000 speakers but it certainly isn't extinct. The speakers of the language even have a country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.44.134.1 (talk) 18:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

finno-ugric languages are missing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.196.82.183 (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Finno-Ugric languages are part of the Uralic family, not the Indo-European one. SuperR (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about Hebrew? Leafgreen (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neither: Semitic. --Franta Oashi (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find Thracian or Daco-Thracian in the diagram. The Thracian languages and dialects may be extinct and little is known about them but still they are a separate Indo-European branch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumahess (talk • contribs) 11:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC) Jumahess (talk) 22:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Jumahess[reply]

This is the first constructive comment on this page. СЛУЖБА (talk) 09:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The norman language or NW france was a germanic language, not a romantic language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.64.120 (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should colors other than red and green be used, for the benefit of those with red-green color blindness? DBowie (talk) 18:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice idea. СЛУЖБА (talk) 09:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danish vs Swedish vs Norwegian

Norwegian is far closed to Danish than Danish is to Swedish, yet Swedish and Danish are listed under Old East Norse, while Norwegian is listed together with those Icelandic, etc. under Old West Norse. What's going on?! --90.184.9.209 (talk) 04:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult to read

It's too small to read and means it's basically pointless having it, if people can't read it. 18:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.99.202.228 (talk)

Have You tried this link? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/IndoEuropeanTree.svg If still difficult to read, try pressing "Ctrl" and "+". СЛУЖБА (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian

Someone must replace Macedonian to south slavic languages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.206.125.216 (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Occitan is not gallic, it's ibero-romance

This tree is full of mistakes... one reference out of many: http://www.ethnologue.com/subgroups/oc Someone please amend all the mistakes, or remove the file! Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.235.192.254 (talk) 03:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Manx is not an extinct language

The chart indicates that the language is extinct. The language's article page or its own Wikipedia will indicate otherwise. UN may have previously declared it as extinct but that is no longer the case even though speakers of the language remain few.--109.115.96.99 (talk) 10:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no "silesian" language.

Balto-slavic/Slavic/West/Lechitic/ Polish, Silesian - there's no such language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.231.3.159 (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian

If all the languages in a subbranch are mentioned, then the branch for Armenian should include the following: Classical Armenian (red) --> Middle Armenian (red) --> Eastern Armenian (green)

--> Western Armenian (green)

(with Eastern and Western Armenian both as subbranches of Middle Armenian). Chaojoker (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hellenic tree: Ancient Macedonian, Cappadocian Greek, Pontic Greek, Mariupol Greek (Crimeo-Ukrainian Greek), Griko (Italian Greek) and Katharevousa are missing

I like how this map is extremely detailed, including not just national languages but also regional ones (so-called "dialects"). Regarding the Hellenic tree, I noted that almost all ancient dialects are included, but less attention is given to medieval and modern (Pontic, Cappadocian, Italian) Greek varieties (with the exception of Tzakonian, which is included). --Anaxicrates (talk) 23:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some parts of the tree are in Bengali

I'm not sure whether this is some bug that's only on my end, but a bunch of entries in the tree are in Bengali when I view the SVG file directly. This problem seems to only affect the SVG file and not the PNG previews, and it seems to have started with the versions uploaded by User:Tanay barisha. My system language is not Bengali, so I have no clue how this could possibly be something on my end, but just in case, could someone please confirm whether they're seeing this bug too, and if so, fix the graphic? Edderiofer (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Edderiofer: Here is what I am seeing:

here and here - English
here (svg) and here (png) (after clicking the file links in the above pages) - English
here (svg) (after rendering in Bengali by clicking "Go") - Bengali
here (png) - Bengali

Did the translation through svgtranslate. If this was done wrong, anyone may undo it. Regards.

তনয় ^(t̪ɔnɔj) 16:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's not what I'm seeing. Here's what I'm seeing instead:

here and here - English
here (svg) - Mostly English but some entries are in Bengali
here (png) - English
here (svg) (after rendering in Bengali by clicking "Go") - Mostly English but some entries are in Bengali
here (png) - Mostly English but some entries are in Bengali

If anyone has any idea what's going on, please let me know, or sort it out. Edderiofer (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: This seems to have since been fixed in the version uploaded by Puck04 (18 January 2022) and onwards. Still don't know how that bug happened, but at least it seems to be fine now. Edderiofer (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Belarusian

The English spelling is "Belarusian", not "Belorussian". 91.151.136.192 (talk) 12:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]