Jump to content

First uncountable ordinal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 123.125.157.8 (talk) at 09:47, 3 September 2012 (Undid revision 510561439 by 123.125.157.8 (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In mathematics, the first uncountable ordinal, traditionally denoted by ω1 or sometimes by Ω, is the smallest ordinal number that, considered as a set, is uncountable. It is the supremum of all countable ordinals. The elements of ω1 are the countable ordinals, of which there are uncountably many.

Like any ordinal number (in von Neumann's approach), ω1 is a well-ordered set, with set membership ("∈") serving as the order relation. ω1 is a limit ordinal, i.e. there is no ordinal α with α + 1 = ω1.

The cardinality of the set ω1 is the first uncountable cardinal number, ℵ1 (aleph-one). The ordinal ω1 is thus the initial ordinal of ℵ1. Indeed, in most constructions ω1 and ℵ1 are equal as sets. To generalize: if α is an arbitrary ordinal we define ωα as the initial ordinal of the cardinal ℵα.

The existence of ω1 can be proven without the axiom of choice. (See Hartogs number.)

Topological properties

Any ordinal number can be turned into a topological space by using the order topology. When viewed as a topological space, ω1 is often written as [0,ω1) to emphasize that it is the space consisting of all ordinals smaller than ω1.

Every increasing ω-sequence of elements of [0,ω1) converges to a limit in [0,ω1). The reason is that the union (=supremum) of every countable set of countable ordinals is another countable ordinal.

The topological space [0,ω1) is sequentially compact but not compact. It is however countably compact and thus not Lindelöf. In terms of axioms of countability, [0,ω1) is first countable but not separable nor second countable. As a consequence, it is not metrizable.

The space [0, ω1] = ω1 + 1 is compact and not first countable. ω1 is used to define the long line and the Tychonoff plank, two important counterexamples in topology.

See also

References

  • Thomas Jech, Set Theory, 3rd millennium ed., 2003, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 3-540-44085-2.
  • Lynn Arthur Steen and J. Arthur Seebach, Jr., Counterexamples in Topology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978. Reprinted by Dover Publications, New York, 1995. ISBN 0-486-68735-X (Dover edition).