Jump to content

God object

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MystBot (talk | contribs) at 02:55, 11 May 2010 (robot Adding: fr:Objet omniscient). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In object-oriented programming, a God object is an object that knows too much or does too much. The God object is an example of an anti-pattern.

The basic idea behind structured programming is that a big problem is broken down into several smaller problems (a divide and conquer strategy) and solutions are created for each of them. Once the small problems have been solved, the big problem as a whole has been solved. Therefore there is only one object about which an object needs to know everything: itself. Likewise, there is only one set of problems an object needs to solve: its own.

God object–based code does not follow this approach. Instead, most of a program's overall functionality is coded into a single "all-knowing" object, which maintains most of the information about the entire program and provides most of the methods for manipulating this data. Because this object holds so much data and requires so many methods, its role in the program becomes God-like (all-encompassing). Instead of program objects communicating amongst themselves directly, the other objects within the program rely on the God object for most of their information and interaction. Since the God object is referenced by so much of the other code, maintenance becomes more difficult than it would in a more evenly divided programming design.

A God object is the object-oriented analogue of failing to use subroutines in procedural programming languages, or of using far too many global variables to store state information.

While creating a God object is typically considered bad programming practice, this technique is occasionally used for tight programming environments (such as microcontrollers), where the slight performance increase and centralization of control is more important than maintainability and programming elegance.

See also

Further reading

  • Riel, Arthur J. (1996). "Chapter 3: Topologies of Action-Oriented Vs. Object-Oriented Applications". Object-Oriented Design Heuristics. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 020163385X. 3.2: Do not create god classes/objects in your system. Be very suspicious of an abstraction whose name contains Driver, Manager, System, or Subsystem.
  • Anti-Patterns and Worst Practices – Monster Objects