Hoe-farming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Monkbot (talk | contribs) at 07:08, 21 January 2014 (→‎References: Fix CS1 deprecated date parameter errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hoe-farming is a collective term for certain forms of agriculture.[citation needed] In the farming of some early societies, and in some traditional cultures of the recent times or the near past, the tillage was done with simple manual tools like digging sticks or hoes, for example seeding was done manually by making holes for the seeds, putting them inside, then covering them.

The precursor to hoe-farming may be intensive gathering.[1] As for its future, it does not necessarily “become superseded” by applying plough and animal traction, because ecological factors are also very important.[2] Even the prevalence of the tsetse fly can matter [citation needed]. Also cultural factors can be considered (for example the local belief system can contain taboos against animal traction).[3]

Hoe-farming often coincides with long fallow systems and shifting cultivation, contrasted to permanent plough-based cultivation systems and the intensification of agriculture.[4] Hoe-farming may contain slash and burn clearance techniques, but they are not strictly necessary.[5] It is usually embedded in the logic of subsistence agriculture.

Examples

A traditional area of hoe-farming (“Hackbaugürtel”) included Sub-Saharan Africa, India and Maritime Southeast Asia, and the middle parts of the Americas.[6] Presumably early forms of agriculture were much more widespread in the past, but could remain dominant against the spread of intensive farming mainly in the tropics.

The Isanzu were hoe-farming people (while the neighboring Hadzabe kept on living as hunter-gatherers).[7]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Nagy Olivérné & Ortutay Gyula (eds) (1977–1982) (see online in Hungarian)
  2. ^ Ökonomische Anthropologie — Fragen: question 33 (see online in German)
  3. ^ IFAD, Uganda women: section “Animal Draught Power” (see online)
  4. ^ Pingali & Bigot & Binswanger & 1987: section “Introduction and Policy Overview”, pp. 1, 4 (see online)
  5. ^ Kienzle 2003 (see online)
  6. ^ Ziller 1974 (see online in German)
  7. ^ Kohl-Larsen 1956: 13–14

References

  • "Women's farm implements in Uganda". International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), a specialized agency of the United Nations.
  • Kienzle, Josef (May 2003). "Labour Saving Technologies and Practices for Farming and Household Activities in Eastern and Southern Africa". Pretoria, South Africa. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |conference= ignored (help)
  • Kohl-Larsen, Ludwig (1956). Das Elefantenspiel. Mythen, Riesen und Stammessagen. Volkserzählungen der Tindiga (in German). Eisenach • Kassel: Erich Röth-Verlag. The book is a collection of Hadzabe myths about giants, also some tribe myths about culture heroes, and anecdotical tales.
  • Nagy Olivérné & Ortutay Gyula (eds) (1977–1982). "Földművelés". Magyar Néprajzi Lexikon (in Hungarian). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help) Title means Hungarian Ethnological Lexicon, item means “Cultivation”.
  • "Ökonomische Anthropologie — Fragen" (PDF) (in German).
  • Pingali, Prabhu (1987). Agricultural Mechanization and the Evolution of Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (plain text). Baltimore • London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-3502-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Ziller, Reinhart (1974). Der Pflug. Geschichtliche Entwicklung und praktische Anwendung (PDF) (in German). Stuttgart.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) The title means: The plough. Historical development and practical application.

External links