This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT(talk | contribs) at 20:48, 8 October 2017(Dating maintenance tags: {{Clarify}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:48, 8 October 2017 by AnomieBOT(talk | contribs)(Dating maintenance tags: {{Clarify}})
of positive radius R lying in the upper half-plane, centred at the origin. If the function f is of the form
with a positive parameter a, then Jordan's lemma states the following upper bound for the contour integral:
where equal sign is when g vanishes everywhere[clarification needed]. An analogous statement for a semicircular contour in the lower half-plane holds when a < 0.
Remarks
If f is continuous on the semicircular contour CR for all large R and
Compared to the estimation lemma, the upper bound in Jordan's lemma does not explicitly depend on the length of the contour CR.
Application of Jordan's lemma
Jordan's lemma yields a simple way to calculate the integral along the real axis of functions f(z) = ei a z g(z)holomorphic on the upper half-plane and continuous on the closed upper half-plane, except possibly at a finite number of non-real points z1, z2, …, zn. Consider the closed contour C, which is the concatenation of the paths C1 and C2 shown in the picture. By definition,
Since on C2 the variable z is real, the second integral is real:
The left-hand side may be computed using the residue theorem to get, for all R larger than the maximum of |z1|, |z2|, …, |zn|,
where Res(f, zk) denotes the residue of f at the singularity zk. Hence, if f satisfies condition (*), then taking the limit as R tends to infinity, the contour integral over C1 vanishes by Jordan's lemma and we get the value of the improper integral
Example
The function
satisfies the condition of Jordan's lemma with a = 1 for all R > 0 with R ≠ 1. Note that, for R > 1,
hence (*) holds. Since the only singularity of f in the upper half plane is at z = i, the above application yields
Since z = i is a simple pole of f and 1 + z2 = (z + i)(z − i), we obtain
so that
This result exemplifies the way some integrals difficult to compute with classical methods are easily evaluated with the help of complex analysis.